SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BubbaFred who wrote (6236)11/6/2004 4:34:04 PM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 22250
 
Zionist thought police at it again:

"Friends and Colleagues,
Many of you are probably aware of the campaign against Joseph Massad, an assistant professor in the Middle East studies department of Columbia University, by a pro-Israel group called the David Project (www.davidproject.org). More specifically, the group has produced a film alleging that Massad has made anti-semitic remarks and intimidated Israeli/Jewish students in his classes.
Normally, I would send a summary or script of the film to help people make up their own minds about the issue, but the David Project has handled the film in a secretive way. They have not posted a script, excerpts, or even a detailed summary on their website. Moreover, they only screened the film publicly a few days ago, after firing up the rumor mill for several weeks with selective press leaks and private screenings to university administrators. That being said, the website posts press writeups on the film that also feature a number of quotes from Jewish students who refuted the allegations of intimidation and anti-semitism.
Massad's response to the allegations is reproduced below. I urge you to take a few minutes to look into this, as it is part of a larger and dangerous trend to control the academic discourse in the United States on the Middle East, as exemplified by Campus Watch and the Title VI restrictions. If you share this impression, please add your name to the petition defending academic freedom at Columbia.
In the aftermath of the U.S. presidential election, now is not the time to despair. Those who want to curtail the spaces for scholarship and activism are feeling vindicated and will undoubtedly seek to press their advantage. Do not let them. Now is the time to push back.
Darryl"
"Intimidating Columbia University
Joseph Massad, assistant professor at Columbia University and Al-Ahram Weekly contributing writer, is the latest target in an ongoing witch-hunt launched by pro-Israel groups within American academia. Below is a statement he issued in response:
The recent controversy elicited by the propaganda film Columbia Unbecoming, a film funded and produced by a Boston-based pro- Israel organisation, is the latest salvo in a campaign of intimidation of Jewish and non-Jewish professors who criticise Israel. This witch-hunt aims to stifle pluralism, academic freedom, and the freedom of expression on university campuses in order to ensure that only one opinion is permitted, that of uncritical support for the State of Israel.
Columbia University, the Department of Middle East and Asian Languages and Cultures, and I personally, have been the target of this intensified campaign for over three years. Pro-Israel groups are pressuring the university to abandon proper academic procedure in evaluating scholarship, and want to force the university to silence all critical opinions. Such silencing, the university has refused to do so far, despite mounting intimidation tactics by these anti- democratic and anti-academic forces.
The major strategy that these pro-Israel groups use is one that equates criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism. But the claim that criticism of Israel is an expression of anti-Semitism presupposes that Israeli actions are "Jewish" actions and that all Jews, whether Israelis or non-Israelis (and the majority of world Jews are not Israelis), are responsible for all Israeli actions and that they all have the same
opinion of Israel.
But this is utter anti-Semitic nonsense. Jews, whether in America, Europe, Israel, Russia, or Argentina, are, like all other groups, not uniform in their political or social opinions. There are many Israeli Jews who are critical of Israel just as there are American Jews who criticise Israeli policy. I have always made a distinction between Jews, Israelis, and Zionists in my writings and my lectures. It is those who want to claim that Jews, Israelis, and Zionists are one group (and that they think exactly alike) who are the anti- Semites. Israel in fact has no legal,
moral, or political basis to represent world Jews (ten million strong) who never elected it to that position and who refuse to move to that country.
Unlike the pro-Israel groups, I do not think that Israeli actions are "Jewish" actions or that they reflect the will of the Jewish people worldwide! All those pro-Israeli propagandists who want to reduce the Jewish people to the State of Israel are the anti-Semites who want to eliminate the existing pluralism among Jews. The majority of Israel's supporters in the United States are, in fact, not Jews but Christian fundamentalist anti-Semites who seek to convert Jews. They constitute a
quarter of the American electorate and are the most powerful anti-Semitic group worldwide. The reason why the pro-Israel groups do not fight them is because these anti-Semites are pro-Israel. Therefore, it is not anti-Semitism that offends pro- Israel groups; what offends them is anti-Israel criticism. In fact, Israel and the US groups supporting it have long received financial and political support from numerous
anti-Semites.
This is not to say that some anti-Zionists may not also be anti-Semitic. Some are, and I have denounced them in my writings and lectures. But the test of their anti-Semitism is not whether they like or hate Israel. The test of anti-Semitism is anti-Jewish hatred, not anti-Israel criticism. In my forthcoming book, The Persistence of the Palestinian Question, I link the Jewish Question to the Palestinian Question and conclude that both questions persist because anti-Semitism persists. To resolve the Palestinian and the Jewish questions, our task is to fight
anti-Semitism in any guise, whether in its pro-Israel or anti-Israel guise, and not to defend the reprehensible policies of the racist Israeli government.
I am now being targeted because of my public writings and statements through the charge that I am allegedly intolerant in the classroom, a charge based on statements made by people who were never my students, except in one case which I will address momentarily. Let me first state that I have intimidated no one. In fact, Tomy Schoenfeld, the Israeli soldier who appears in the film and is cited by the New York Sun, has never been my student and has never taken a class with me, as he himself
informed The Jewish Week. I have never met him.
As for Noah Liben, who appears in the film according to newspaper accounts (I have not seen the film), he was indeed a student in my Palestinian and Israeli Politics and Societies course in the spring of 2001. Noah seems to have forgotten the incident he cites. During a lecture about Israeli state racism against Asian and African Jews, Noah defended these practices on the basis that Asian and African Jews were underdeveloped and lacked Jewish culture, which the Ashkenazi State operatives were teaching them. When I explained to him that, as the assigned readings clarified, these were racist policies, he insisted that these Jews needed to be modernised and the Ashkenazim were helping them by civilising them.
Many students gasped. He asked me if I understood his point. I informed him that I did not. Noah seems not to have done his reading during the week on gender and Zionism. One of the assigned readings by Israeli scholar and feminist Simona Sharoni spoke of how in Hebrew the word "zayin" means both penis and weapon in a discussion of Israeli militarised masculinity. Noah, seemingly not having read the assigned
material, mistook the pronunciation of "zayin" as "Zion", pronounced in Hebrew "tziyon". As for his spurious claim that I said that "Jews in Nazi Germany were not physically abused or harassed until Kristallnacht in November 1938", Noah must not have been listening carefully.
During the discussion of Nazi Germany, we addressed the racist ideology of Nazism, the Nuremberg Laws enacted in 1934, and the institutionalised racism and violence against all facets of Jewish life, all of which preceded the extermination of European Jews. This information was also available to Noah in his readings, had he chosen to consult them. Moreover, the lie that the film propagates claiming that I would equate Israel with Nazi Germany is abhorrent. I have never made such a
reprehensible equation.
I remember having a friendly rapport with Noah (as I do with all my students). He would drop off newspaper articles in my mailbox, come to my office hours, and greet me on the street often. He never informed me or acted in a way that showed intimidation. Indeed, he would write me e-mails, even after he stopped being my student, to argue with me about Israel. I have kept our correspondence.
On 10 March, 2002, a year after he took a class with me, Noah wrote me an e-mail chastising me for having invited an Israeli speaker to class the year before when he was in attendance. It turned out that Noah's memory failed him again, as he mistook the speaker I had invited for another Israeli scholar. After a long diatribe, Noah excoriated me: "How can you bring such a phony to speak to your class??"
I am not sure if his misplaced reproach was indicative of an intimidated student or one who felt comfortable enough to rebuke his professor!
I am dedicated to all my students, many of whom are Jewish. Neither Columbia University nor I have ever received a complaint from any student claiming intimidation or any such nonsense. Students at Columbia have many venues of lodging complaints, whether with the student deans and assistant deans, school deans and assistant deans, department chairmen, departmental directors of undergraduate studies, the ombudsman's office, the provost, the president, and the professors themselves. No such complaint was ever filed.
Many of my Jewish and non-Jewish students (including my Arab students) differ with me in all sorts of ways, whether on politics or on philosophy or theory. This is exactly what teaching and learning are about, how to articulate differences and understand other perspectives while acquiring knowledge, how to analyse one's own perspective and those of others, how to interrogate the basis of an opinion.
Columbia University is home to the most prestigious centre for Israel and Jewish studies in the country. Columbia has six endowed chairs in Jewish studies (ranging from religion to Yiddish to Hebrew literature, among others). In addition, a seventh chair in Israel studies is now being established after pro-Israel groups launched a vicious campaign against the only chair in modern Arab studies that Columbia established two years ago, demanding "balance"!
Columbia does not have a centre for Arab studies, let alone a centre for Palestine studies. The Department of Middle East and Asian Languages and Cultures (MEALAC) encompasses the study of over one billion South Asians, over 300 million Arabs, tens of millions of Turks, of Iranians, of Kurds, of Armenians, and of six million Israelis, five million of whom are Jewish.
To study these varied populations and cultures, MEALAC has three full time professors who cover Israel and Hebrew, four full time professors to cover the Arab World, and two full-time professors who cover South Asia. One need not do complicated mathematics to see who is overrepresented and who is not, if the question is indeed a demographic one.
Moreover, the class that this propaganda machine is targeting, my "Palestinian and Israeli Politics and Societies" course, is one of a number of courses offered at Columbia that cover the Palestinian/Israel conflict. All the others have an Israel-friendly perspective, including Naomi Weinberger's "Conflict Resolution in the Middle East", Michael Stanislawski's "History of the State of Israel, 1948-Present" and a course offered in my own department by my colleague Dan Miron, "Zionism: A
Cultural Perspective".
My course, which is critical of Zionism and Palestinian nationalism, is in fact an elective course which no student is forced to take.
Let us briefly review these claims of intimidation. Not only have the students (all but Noah have not even taken my courses) not used a single university venue to articulate their alleged grievances, they are now sponsored by a private political organisation with huge funds that produced and funded a film about them, screened it to the major US media and to the top brass of the Columbia administration.
Last Wednesday, the film was screened in Israel to a government minister and to participants at a conference on anti- Semitism. The film has still not been released to the public here and is used as a sort of secret evidence in a military trial.
The film has also been used to trump up a national campaign with the aid of a New York congressman to get me fired. All this power of intimidation is being exercised not by a professor against students, but by political organisations who use students against a junior non-tenured faculty member. A senior departmental colleague of mine, Dan Miron, who votes on my promotion and tenure, has recently expressed open support for this campaign of intimidation based on hearsay.
Indeed with this campaign against me going into its fourth year, I chose under the duress of coercion and intimidation not to teach my course this year. It is my academic freedom that has been circumscribed. But not only mine. The Columbia courses that remain are all taught from an Israel-friendly angle.
The aim of the David Project propaganda film is to undermine our academic freedom, our freedom of speech, and Columbia's tradition of openness and pluralism.
It is in reaction to this witch-hunt that 718 international scholars and students signed a letter defending me against intimidation and sent it to President Bollinger, with hundreds more sending separate letters, while over 1,300 people from all walks of life are signing an online petition supporting me and academic freedom. Academics and students from around the world recognise that the message of this propaganda film is to suppress pluralism at Columbia and at all American universities so that one and
only one opinion be allowed on campuses, the opinion of defending Israel uncritically.
I need not remind anyone that this is a slippery slope, for the same pressures could be applied to faculty who have been critical of US foreign policy, in Iraq for example, on the grounds that such critiques are unpatriotic.
Surely we all agree that while the university can hardly defend any one political position on any current question, it must defend the need for debate and critical consideration of all such questions, whether in public fora or in the classroom. Anything less would be the beginning of the death of academic freedom."

Joseph Massad



To: BubbaFred who wrote (6236)3/22/2005 11:22:55 AM
From: Emile Vidrine  Respond to of 22250
 
One Less Than Six Million

by Mark Glenn

It was the event of the 20th century, at least according to the history as written by the conquerors. It has pervaded Western thinking and morals for over 50 years now, and those in the West (particularly in America) are not spared a day wherein they are not reminded of its importance. It is the subject of literally hundreds of films, from Schindler's List to Sophie's Choice to the obligatory programs appearing on public television. It has been raised in the consciousness of the Christian West as the ultimate act of savagery and brutality, an act that has never and will never be surpassed in its inhumanity. It has become the grain of sand around which the black pearl of collective guilt has been formed, and it is the weapon whose brandishment elicits the Pavlovian response of a conditioned populace whose sentiments are used for the furtherance of public policy. It has become the new religion for many, a blank check for a few, a slavemaster to others, and it is known as the Holocaust.

Not since the 2,000 years following the Crucifixion of Christ has such infamy been placed on a single event. Whereas the murder of Christ by the leadership of Israel formed the basis around which the religion of Christianity would be formed, now the murder of the decendants of those leaders at the hands of those professing to be Christians has supplanted what was the religion which helped to create Western Civilization. In some countries it is illegal to challenge the dogmas of this new religion, and in other countries where it may still be legal, an individual engaging in any scholarly study that wanders outside the parameters which have been rigidly established by the High Priests of Holocaustism is sure to be victim to an inquisition of sorts. It may result in something as dramatic as losing one's livlihood or even losing one's life. One thing is for certain though, which is that there will be Hell to pay for the individual who jeapordizes the ground which the bludgeon of Holocaustism has gained for Israel and for the interests of Marxist Zionism. To lessen the seriousness of the crime, to cause others to forget what plight and tragedy happened to its victims is to commit a capital offense which will be avenged at any cost. To bring it into relative terms, showing its diminutive stature in comparison to the Holocausts authored by the other siblings within the Marxist family results in one being branded an enemy of the people. To cause others to deflect their attention towards the plight of others, to cause them to shift their gaze towards injustices wrought against someone else is a mortal sin of the highest order. To reduce its size by even one less than six million will result in organized fits of apoplexy of the most maniacal version, and understandably so, particularly when it becomes apparent what is to be gained and what is to be lost because of it. It is the goose which lays the golden egg, the key which locks and unlocks all gates to the centers of power for those who brandish it, and it is as feared in intellectual circles today as was a knock on the door in the middle of the night in Stalin's Russia. Presidents, kings, writers, academicians and all others who occupy some position of importance in the effluent society of the formerly Christian West today bow their intellects reverently, if not fearfully, towards this golden calf, dutifully acknowledging in the process that they owe their lives and livlihoods to his good graces. But in all respects, the entire process is wrought with hypocrisy, which is the only genuine article that can be found in the whole sordid affair.

The ugliness of this particular brand of hypocrisy can be said to be such not only in its inherent sense of dishonesty, but also due to the contempt with which it holds its victims. In its application it betrays the fact that the perpetrators consider the rest of humanity to be so stupid as to be easily fooled by their sense of false values by which they have gained their ascendency and respectability. Clearly, for Christians, this discussion should have particular importance, particularly when considered within the context of the dramatic events which surrounded their Messiah and the Pharisaical hypocrisy which he so clearly condemned. And if today's world can be said to be infected in a full blown way with this particular virulency known as hypocrisy, then verily it reveals itself in the religion that has been formed around the suffering of Hitler's victims, (and in particular the Jews) during the Holocaust. Even its title, Holocaust (meaning sacrifice) carries with it the implication that the crime of murdering the Ashkenazim lambs of Europe serves as a replacement and anti-type to the murder of the Lamb of God around whom the religion of Christianity has been formed. In essence, the final solution which the proselytizers of the new religion of Holocaustism have sought and nearly accomplished has been the replacement and reconfiguring of Western morality so as to be in allignment with the agenda of Israel, as well as in silencing dissent towards her actions. There are several tragedies which are associated with this new religion, one of which is that those who were Hitler's victims, who suffered and deserve what is a rightly earned sense of compassion from history and from humanity have been made showpieces in a spectacle which has defiled and degraded the solemnity and seriousness of their plight. The badge of honor which they earned by virtue of the nightmare that was inflicted upon them, a badge which they justly deserve to wear has been, due to the adventurism and ambitiousness of the more profligate among them, tarnished and made to appear cheap. The other victim of this tragedy, and probably the most serious aspect of the whole affair, can be said to be the assault on the intellectual process which formulates public policy, and in particular in America. The daily reminder to American Christianity concerning what is alleged to be its collective guilt is like the proverbial salt rubbed into the wound of American intellectualism, and as such has rendered her without the ability to think reasonably as regards her policies in the Middle East, and in particular Palestine. The results are, needless to say, tragic on several levels.

In the first case, the suffering of the Palestinian people, now almost a century long in its duration, has been completely cast aside as a necessary evil in redressing the crime committed by the National Socialists of Hitler's Germany. In such a way, the pimps of Holocaustism (manifested in the out-in-front/in your face stance of those who shape American sentiments towards Israel and by default public policy) have revealed what are the undeniable dogmas upon which their new religion is founded. For them, the fact that the murder of six million, or six thousand, or sixty million, or whatever number in actuality it is, takes on a more sober, somber, serious tone when it happens to fall upon their particular group reveals in and of itself what are the racist, exclusivist, self-absorbed sentiments which form the operating ideologies of their agenda. In their insistance, (particularly with regards to the Holocaust of Nazi Germany) to focus only on the suffering of the Jewish people, grabbing the limelight as it were from the others who proportionally suffered more (including those who were Christian and who have received little if any attention) exemplifies what is on their part an irrational mindset which forms the philosophical underpinnings of an agenda which they attempt to masquerade as a religion of morals. The fact that hundreds of movies have been made by an entertainment industry (for decades now firmly in the hands of Zionist interests) and as of yet there have been few if any movies made which depict the horrors of Stalin's death camps or what was endured by the Christians at the hands of Jewish Bolshevism in relatively the same time period exemplifies what are sentiments rooted in self-absorbed racial narcissism of Titanic proportions. The message which is constantly pounded into the conscious and subconscious intellect of Western (and in particular American) Christianity is one of shameful reflection, which amidst all the films, lectures, books, museums and whatnot all revolve around a set of fixed questions:

How could you do this? How could you let this terrible thing happen? Where are your morals? Where is your sense of compassion? Where is your decency? If this event, the killing of six million Jews at the hands of Christians is but the logical outcome of a religion which is anti-Semitic in its essence, perhaps then you should abandon such a religion, and choose instead to work out your penance for such an infamous act by raising up our suffering as the ultimate act of inhumanity, and consider no other for all eternity.

If these individuals, the pimps and whores who worship the golden calf of the Israeli state and her agenda were truly the humanitarian individuals they pretend to be (a pretension which they effect by their condemnation of Hitler's atrocitites) they would not single out those instances in which they suffered, but would instead condemn all human suffering, including those Holocausts which they or their kin have authored. How conspiculously silent are their voices when a discussion takes place concerning the holocaust of 50 million Russians at the hands of Jewish Bolsheviks, as well as the Holocausts which they have effected against the peoples of the Middle East. Were the the peddlers of Holocaustism genuine in their sentiments, if they were truly possessed of the humanity which they have accused the rest of the world of not having, then they would abandon what has been the welfare system of human sentimentality, a process of exploiting in a parasitical way the good will of American Christianity and its willingness to make reparations for the suffering of Hitler's victims. For the rest of the world not under their spell, the real lesson of all the Holocausts of the 20th Century has not been lost. To the rest of the world not held under the spell of the magicians of Holocaustism, the lesson learned has been that irrespective of whether atrocities were committed by Marxist Christians in Germany or by Marxist Jews in Russia does not matter, but rather that the blood of humanity which has been rendered so worthless does not appreciate or depreciate in value in accordance with its racial origin. As such, for the gangsters at the ADL, JDL, AIPAC, JINSA, and all the other crime families of Marxist Zionism whose job it is to elevate the Jewish blood shed in WWII to a level of superiority over all others, (and in particular over that blood which their cousins in Israel shed in Palestine) betrays what are the detestable traits found in the practitioners of master race ideology, an ideology which they in perfect hypocritical fashion condemn in others who oppose their agenda. And as sickening as such convoluted and contradictory logic is, it is worse when considered that many of the individuals who make the pretense of fighting for the interests of their people, individuals who have been inflicted with what is best termed racial narcissism have themselves been willing participants in bringing to bear the same Holocaust whose historical importance they now use as a vehicle for their own enrichment and empowerment.

"The antisemites will become our most loyal friends, the antisemites nations will become our allies." (One Palestine Complete, p. 47)

For those who have been given an extra sized serving of Holocaust History over the period of the last 4 decades, the above quote would appear to have originated with Hitler or one of his fellow travellers. In its initial appearances, one can imagine a group of Nazi thugs whispering amidst winks and nods to each other about the "Final Solution" that would rid them of all their problems and fulfill all their sick, racist daydreams. The reality of the matter, however, is that its origin resides with the godfather of the Zionist movement, Theodore Herzl.

The reader should not be surprised to see that Herzl, (considered by many in modern Jewry to be a greater savior of the Jewish people than Moses himself) would author such sentiments. His statement reveals what has historically been a secretly nursed hatred for the Jewish people which has been entertained by those occupying positions in their leadership for the last 2,000 years. Historically, they are individuals who have schemed and plotted for their own benefit, using those under them as stepping stones in their ascent to power. Whether their leadership has been religious or secular in nature, they have over the centuries of the Diaspora planted the seeds of suffering which would later blossom into the same anti-semitic presecutions by which they have advanced their power. Tragically, those who have drunk from the poisoned well of Zionist Marxism and who have elevated men like Herzl and others to positions of sainthood and respectability do not realize what an injustice they are doing to themselves and those who follow after them. If the members of modern day Jewry were truly concerned with isolating what have been the root causes of their persecutions and suffering, they would then come to the undeniable conclusion that it has been their leadership which has been the source of their suffering for the last 2 milleniae. From the Pharisees of the Sanhedrin to the Pharisees at the ADL, it has been the racist, exclusivist mindset entertained by those in leadership positions which have been the cause of friction between Jew and Gentile which has led to anti-Semitism. Being that, historically speaking, persecution of the Jewish people has been good for business for the likes of Herzl and others, therefore it should come as no surprise to find them rubbing their hands greedily in expectation of what has been for them a reliable source of enrichment and propagandistic revenue. And as diabolocal as such scheming appears to be when it exists merely in the theoretical stages, more so is it when it is moved from the drawing table to the production line, for in addition to those who theorized, such as Herzl, there are those as well who were directly responsible for the same suffering and persecution which has become the lifeblood of the Holocaust religion. Besides those ardent Zionists who helped finance Hitler's rise to power (exemplified by Jewish banking interests, including those of the Warburgs, Rothshields, and others) more dastardly is the history of those who refused to help those Jews who were suffering under the Holocaust as it was occurring.

"About the cries coming from your country, we should know that all the Allied nations are spilling much of their blood, and if we do not sacrifice any blood, by what right shall we merit coming before the bargaining table when they divide nations and lands at the war's end? For only with blood shall we get the land."

The cold, calculating, ambitious words of the above quote illustrate what was the willingness of Zionist Marxism to participate in the suffering of the Jews for the purpose of furthering their cause. These demonic sentiments are none other than those which were annunciated by representatives of the World Zionist Congress, the most powerful Zionist group in the world at the time. It was a response sent to Michael Ben Weissmandl, a Rabbi who, after being taken prisoner by the Nazis in Slovakia, worked out an arraingement with his captors for the release of tens of thousands of Jews upon payment in the amount of $50,000.00 to officials of the Third Reich. The response he received from Nathan Shwalb, representative of the World Zionist Congress, clearly shows what was a deliberate effort on the part of Marxist Zionism to participate in the suffering of European Jewry for the purposes of increasing their leverage and power. In addition to this, it has been chronicled with equal clarity the cooperation that took place between the Third Reich and the leaders of the Zionist movement for the transfer of almost 1 million Jews to the now infamous death camps in return for the release of a few thousand who were ardent followers of Zionism and considered to be good prospects for the future state of Israel. In addition to these and other nauseating depictions of betrayal and duplicity, the history of the event also reveals what was the involvement of Zionism in acts of terrorism and murder, manifested in bombings of Synagogues and assassinations against anti-Zionist Jews, acts which were then exploited for their propagandistic value in driving Jews into the protective, loving arms of Zionism.

The instances of Jewish leaders executing violence and subterfuge against their own for the purposes of furthering the interests of Zionism are too numerous in number to discount. And as surely as Hitler's remaining henchmen were rounded up and subjected to the justice of the Nuremburg Trials, so too should have been those individuals who held the seats of power in the Zionist organizations and who (for the purposes of consolidating power among themselves) conspired to subject world Jewry to the now infamous instances of inhumanity and suffering. And yet, these historical accounts and many others of similar stripe are conspicuously not mentioned when the ghouls who operate the ADL, JDL, and other organs of espionage and propaganda for Israel's benefit maintain what has become a state of hightened hysteria concerning the ever looming spectre of anti-Semitism and its history. And if a seldom mentioned history has now indicted those individuals who have acted as cannibals upon the suffering of their own people, reducing their victims to a state of sub-humanity who are of no worth outside of that which brings political power, it should then be easy to see how the same individuals would be willing to inflict misery upon those not of their own family as well.

It is within this context therefore one comes to grasp what is the sickeningly apparent reality concerning the peddlersof Holocaustism and the disciples over whom they hold sway. The picture which is fleshed out in clearly discernable images is one of duplicity, avariciousness, and hypocrisy of Apocalyptic proportions. The truth is that the lessons of the Holocaust have been lost on these individuals, and their presence in the dialogue concerning human rights and persecution is as out of place as would be the presence of the Klu Klux Klan in a forum concerning the civil rights of African Americans. As such, society must conclude that all their public displays of outrage over inhumanity and suffering are nothing more than scripted words that have no sincerity behind them, which is revealed not only in the history of what they have done to their own, but as well in the racial hatred they have nurtured against the Palestinians whom they view as impediments to their ascent to power.

"One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail." --Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994

"May the Holy Name visit retribution on the Arab heads, and cause their seed to be lost, and annihilate them." It is forbidden to have pity on them. We must give them missiles with relish, annihilate them. Evil ones, damnable ones." During a sermon preceding the 2001 Passover holiday by the influential Israeli Rabbi Ovadia Yosef: Ha'aretz April 12, 2001

"[The Palestinians] are beasts walking on two legs." Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, speech to the Knesset, New Statesman, June 25,1982.

"...the need to sustain the character of the state which will henceforth be Jewish...with a non-Jewish minority limited to 15 percent. I had already reached this fundamental position as early as 1940 [and] it is entered in my diary." Joseph Weitz, head of the Jewish Agency's Colonization Department. From "Israel: an Apartheid State" by Uri Davis, p. 5.

"The blood of the Jewish people is loved by the Lord; it is therefore redder and their life is preferable." Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, head of the Kever Yossev Yeshiva (school of Talmud) in Nablus. He was later quoted in praise of the infamous machine-gunning to death of 40 Palestinian worshippers by Baruch Goldstein, that it was "a fulfillment of a number of commands of Jewish religious law...Among Goldstein's good deeds, as enumerated, are...taking revenge on non-Jews, extermination of the non-Jews who are from the seed of Amalek...and the sanctification of the Holy Name."

"There is no such thing as a Palestinian people... It is not as if we came and threw them out and took their country. They didn't exist." Golda Meir, in a statement to The Sunday Times, 15 June 1969.

In the post Holocaust age of sensitivity to political speech that even whiffs slightly of what is the ugliness of racist sentiments, the fact that members of Israel's ruling classes are and have been able to utter such abominations and not be called to account for them betrays what is the hypocrisy which flows like rivers through the veins of today's Zionist organizations. More outrageous is the fact that these same individuals who have brought themselves to the centers of political power by riding atop the waves of condemnation for the inhumanity of Nazi racism are willing to embrace the very same Beast which they now make a show of despising. In the above quotes, (which are but a small sample of what exists) a simple rearraingement of the wording to indicate that the authors were Germans talking about Jews would have resulted in world-wide condemnation by the very same Zionist organizations who today have enshrined and lionized those among them who were bold and brash enough to voice the same sentiments in public. To simply designate this as hypocracy is not sufficient, for in reality it is criminal, and on the scale that deserves the same condemnation from history as was showered upon those who were the infamous henchmen of the Third Reich.

The statements, as ugly as they and the sentiments which they betray are, can be said to be merely the tip of the iceberg when compared to the actions which have accompanied them since the birth of Zionism. The list of war crimes perpetrated by the New Third Reich, Israel, wrought against the peoples of the Middle East are crimes which date back to the early years immediately following the Balfour Declaration up to the present, and are clear examples of a nation and its people who are afflicted with the same poison of race-conscious Marxism as existed in Nazi Germany. In the same manner as the deluded people of Germany sat back and justified the actions taken by their government with regard to the extermination of the state's enemies, in like manner so do the citizens of Israel and her supporters abroad in their justification of Israel's extermination of the Arab peoples who dare to sit on the land which was given to them by divine mandate 2000 years ago. Today's disciples of Zionist butchery, who have made as a pillar in their discipleship the condemnation of the defense given by the German people following WWII that "if only we had known, something would have been done," cannot make the same claim concerning the plight of the Palestinians whose concentration camp existence is visible for all to see today. In allowing the men, women and children of Palestine to be degraded to the status of untermenschen as were many of the present inhabitants of Israel in WWII Europe, they have ignored what were the lessons which history has painstakingly sought to impart upon humanity concerning racism and the persecution which inevitably accompanies it. In such a manner, by facilitating the extermination of the "cockroaches" and "beasts" of Palestine as well as subjecting them in the meantime to a daily life of sickness, starvation, violence and fear, they spit on the graves of all those who perished in the Holocaust at the hands of thugs who worked in concert for the furtherance of bloody Marxism, whether it was in the form of Nazism or Zionism.

Those who today are riding atop the Beast known as Marxist Zionism, and who imagine themselves as occupying a place of such power that is impervious to defeat should think again. This hypocricy which manifests itself by those who are forced and pretend to worship Israel and her people, (as personified by those nations of non-Jewish lackeys who today bow reverently before the history of their suffering) is a tenuous and transitory condition. With this in mind, everyone involved who has, for the purposes of furthering the interests of Israel, exploited the event known as the Holocaust and the infamy that it represents should recognize that at some point the clock will run out on them, and along with that their luck. Being that everyone involved has by virtue of their self interested motives long ago shed any sense of honesty or integrety, (be it in their words, deeds, or sentiments) it can be therefore safely said that their sentiments are unreliable at best. Given that today's policies which are propped up by what is in reality a forced sentimentality towards the people of Israel and her suffering means that at some point the world will abandon those sentiments which are not rooted in genuine concern. As such, the wider the war becomes between Israel and her enemies, the more havoc which is wrought upon the world as a result of her beligerent behavior, the less willing will her supporters in gentile nations be willing to run to her defense. And with this in mind, those who use the charge of anti-Semitism and the suffering of the victims of the Holocaust as a bludgeon to silence critics of Israel should recognize that inevitably the value of their currency, (the charge of anti-Semitism) will eventually lose all its purchasing power, at which point they will then be left to the tender mercies of those whom they have bullied now for 5 decades with its use.

Let the world hear no more from the mouths of the Zionist organizations who bewail the death of six million Jews and at the same time cheer the Holocaust of the Arabs in the Middle East. They have demonstrated themselves by such contradictory sentiments to be the dregs of humanity, without an ounce of the same decency which they accuse their critics of not having, an absence of which they attempt to conceal by their pretended condemnation of Hitler's atrocities. In truth the tears they pretend to shed over the murder of millions in WWII might as well be tears of joy for all the sincerity that is behind them. In their insistance upon elevating the suffering and well-being of their cousins in Israel over the rest of the peoples in the Middle East (and in the rest of the world, for that matter), they have revealed themselves to be vampires and ghouls without an ounce of soul left in them, dispossessed of the qualities of compassion and justice which separate man from beast. In their insistance upon sanctifying the violence and duplicity with which the humanity of the Middle Eastern peoples is violated, denying in the process the existence of their suffering and misery, the High Priests of Marxist Zionism have become carbon copies of the same Holocaust deniers whom they castigate today through their effective infrastructures of propaganda. In the meantime, the world might as well prepare itself for the new era which is quickly approaching as a result of Zionism's hatred for mankind, an era in which will be asked the same questions concerning the Holocaust of the Arabs (Muslim and Christian) as were asked concerning the Holocaust of the Jews:

How could you? How could you just sit by and do nothing? Where is your humanity? Where is your decency?

At which point the world, condemned by its foolishness in allowing the vampires of Marxist Zionism to again drown humanity in its own blood will have to sit there, unable to say anything in its defense other than "I was just following orders." If it should be said that the lessons of the Holocaust should be reduced to one, all encompassing, non-discriminating dictum, it is that human suffering at the hands of a group of thugs who stand to gain by such suffering is a crime. The type of blood which flows in the veins of brutality's victims should not have an exchange rate attached to it by virtue of which race it designates. The one truth that should be enshrined forever in monuments and movies should be that misery which has been authored by racism or political ambition is a crime anywhere and at anytime. And with this in mind, those who would raise the importance of Jewish suffering over the suffering of others should be seen as the frauds that they are, and therefore let the world disregard without hesitation all the feigned sentimentality that they make in their passionate yet disingenuous condemnation of crimes against humanity.

As for the rest of the world, it should begin the long overdue abandonment of the system of weights and measures which it has adopted with regards to human suffering. Such a system is nothing more than a convoluted violation of the laws of decency, a backwards attempt to quantify and qualify human suffering through the use of maniacal formulae, genetic calculations and other methods of junk science. The followers of such a system, despite their perceived power and respectability, are by definition nothing more than academecians in the now defunct Flat-Earth Society who deserve neither consideration no respect. Amidst their outrageous exhortations for the execution of violence upon all those whom they have deemed to be "beasts walking on two legs," instead let what remains of humanity understand that blood is red everywhere, without any respect paid to the veins which carry it.

As such, let the world finally rid itself of the sickness of racism which has been the author of so much suffering. Let humanity once and for all drive a wooden stake into the heart of all political thought which embraces the heresy of master-race ideology, and let mankind finally grasp the reality that all holocausts and institutions of human suffering are vile, even those which bear the distinction of being one less than six million.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

One Less Than Six Million is an excerpt of the work entitled The Beast Unmasked...Israel Without Her Mascara which is due to be released shortly. Mark Glenn is also the author of Not My Words, But Theirs...A Christian American's Defense of Middle Eastern Culture and its People.

The website for the book may be accessed at www.notmywords.com. The author may be reached at mglenn@mediamonitors.org



To: BubbaFred who wrote (6236)3/22/2005 11:22:58 AM
From: Emile Vidrine  Respond to of 22250
 
One Less Than Six Million

by Mark Glenn

It was the event of the 20th century, at least according to the history as written by the conquerors. It has pervaded Western thinking and morals for over 50 years now, and those in the West (particularly in America) are not spared a day wherein they are not reminded of its importance. It is the subject of literally hundreds of films, from Schindler's List to Sophie's Choice to the obligatory programs appearing on public television. It has been raised in the consciousness of the Christian West as the ultimate act of savagery and brutality, an act that has never and will never be surpassed in its inhumanity. It has become the grain of sand around which the black pearl of collective guilt has been formed, and it is the weapon whose brandishment elicits the Pavlovian response of a conditioned populace whose sentiments are used for the furtherance of public policy. It has become the new religion for many, a blank check for a few, a slavemaster to others, and it is known as the Holocaust.

Not since the 2,000 years following the Crucifixion of Christ has such infamy been placed on a single event. Whereas the murder of Christ by the leadership of Israel formed the basis around which the religion of Christianity would be formed, now the murder of the decendants of those leaders at the hands of those professing to be Christians has supplanted what was the religion which helped to create Western Civilization. In some countries it is illegal to challenge the dogmas of this new religion, and in other countries where it may still be legal, an individual engaging in any scholarly study that wanders outside the parameters which have been rigidly established by the High Priests of Holocaustism is sure to be victim to an inquisition of sorts. It may result in something as dramatic as losing one's livlihood or even losing one's life. One thing is for certain though, which is that there will be Hell to pay for the individual who jeapordizes the ground which the bludgeon of Holocaustism has gained for Israel and for the interests of Marxist Zionism. To lessen the seriousness of the crime, to cause others to forget what plight and tragedy happened to its victims is to commit a capital offense which will be avenged at any cost. To bring it into relative terms, showing its diminutive stature in comparison to the Holocausts authored by the other siblings within the Marxist family results in one being branded an enemy of the people. To cause others to deflect their attention towards the plight of others, to cause them to shift their gaze towards injustices wrought against someone else is a mortal sin of the highest order. To reduce its size by even one less than six million will result in organized fits of apoplexy of the most maniacal version, and understandably so, particularly when it becomes apparent what is to be gained and what is to be lost because of it. It is the goose which lays the golden egg, the key which locks and unlocks all gates to the centers of power for those who brandish it, and it is as feared in intellectual circles today as was a knock on the door in the middle of the night in Stalin's Russia. Presidents, kings, writers, academicians and all others who occupy some position of importance in the effluent society of the formerly Christian West today bow their intellects reverently, if not fearfully, towards this golden calf, dutifully acknowledging in the process that they owe their lives and livlihoods to his good graces. But in all respects, the entire process is wrought with hypocrisy, which is the only genuine article that can be found in the whole sordid affair.

The ugliness of this particular brand of hypocrisy can be said to be such not only in its inherent sense of dishonesty, but also due to the contempt with which it holds its victims. In its application it betrays the fact that the perpetrators consider the rest of humanity to be so stupid as to be easily fooled by their sense of false values by which they have gained their ascendency and respectability. Clearly, for Christians, this discussion should have particular importance, particularly when considered within the context of the dramatic events which surrounded their Messiah and the Pharisaical hypocrisy which he so clearly condemned. And if today's world can be said to be infected in a full blown way with this particular virulency known as hypocrisy, then verily it reveals itself in the religion that has been formed around the suffering of Hitler's victims, (and in particular the Jews) during the Holocaust. Even its title, Holocaust (meaning sacrifice) carries with it the implication that the crime of murdering the Ashkenazim lambs of Europe serves as a replacement and anti-type to the murder of the Lamb of God around whom the religion of Christianity has been formed. In essence, the final solution which the proselytizers of the new religion of Holocaustism have sought and nearly accomplished has been the replacement and reconfiguring of Western morality so as to be in allignment with the agenda of Israel, as well as in silencing dissent towards her actions. There are several tragedies which are associated with this new religion, one of which is that those who were Hitler's victims, who suffered and deserve what is a rightly earned sense of compassion from history and from humanity have been made showpieces in a spectacle which has defiled and degraded the solemnity and seriousness of their plight. The badge of honor which they earned by virtue of the nightmare that was inflicted upon them, a badge which they justly deserve to wear has been, due to the adventurism and ambitiousness of the more profligate among them, tarnished and made to appear cheap. The other victim of this tragedy, and probably the most serious aspect of the whole affair, can be said to be the assault on the intellectual process which formulates public policy, and in particular in America. The daily reminder to American Christianity concerning what is alleged to be its collective guilt is like the proverbial salt rubbed into the wound of American intellectualism, and as such has rendered her without the ability to think reasonably as regards her policies in the Middle East, and in particular Palestine. The results are, needless to say, tragic on several levels.

In the first case, the suffering of the Palestinian people, now almost a century long in its duration, has been completely cast aside as a necessary evil in redressing the crime committed by the National Socialists of Hitler's Germany. In such a way, the pimps of Holocaustism (manifested in the out-in-front/in your face stance of those who shape American sentiments towards Israel and by default public policy) have revealed what are the undeniable dogmas upon which their new religion is founded. For them, the fact that the murder of six million, or six thousand, or sixty million, or whatever number in actuality it is, takes on a more sober, somber, serious tone when it happens to fall upon their particular group reveals in and of itself what are the racist, exclusivist, self-absorbed sentiments which form the operating ideologies of their agenda. In their insistance, (particularly with regards to the Holocaust of Nazi Germany) to focus only on the suffering of the Jewish people, grabbing the limelight as it were from the others who proportionally suffered more (including those who were Christian and who have received little if any attention) exemplifies what is on their part an irrational mindset which forms the philosophical underpinnings of an agenda which they attempt to masquerade as a religion of morals. The fact that hundreds of movies have been made by an entertainment industry (for decades now firmly in the hands of Zionist interests) and as of yet there have been few if any movies made which depict the horrors of Stalin's death camps or what was endured by the Christians at the hands of Jewish Bolshevism in relatively the same time period exemplifies what are sentiments rooted in self-absorbed racial narcissism of Titanic proportions. The message which is constantly pounded into the conscious and subconscious intellect of Western (and in particular American) Christianity is one of shameful reflection, which amidst all the films, lectures, books, museums and whatnot all revolve around a set of fixed questions:

How could you do this? How could you let this terrible thing happen? Where are your morals? Where is your sense of compassion? Where is your decency? If this event, the killing of six million Jews at the hands of Christians is but the logical outcome of a religion which is anti-Semitic in its essence, perhaps then you should abandon such a religion, and choose instead to work out your penance for such an infamous act by raising up our suffering as the ultimate act of inhumanity, and consider no other for all eternity.

If these individuals, the pimps and whores who worship the golden calf of the Israeli state and her agenda were truly the humanitarian individuals they pretend to be (a pretension which they effect by their condemnation of Hitler's atrocitites) they would not single out those instances in which they suffered, but would instead condemn all human suffering, including those Holocausts which they or their kin have authored. How conspiculously silent are their voices when a discussion takes place concerning the holocaust of 50 million Russians at the hands of Jewish Bolsheviks, as well as the Holocausts which they have effected against the peoples of the Middle East. Were the the peddlers of Holocaustism genuine in their sentiments, if they were truly possessed of the humanity which they have accused the rest of the world of not having, then they would abandon what has been the welfare system of human sentimentality, a process of exploiting in a parasitical way the good will of American Christianity and its willingness to make reparations for the suffering of Hitler's victims. For the rest of the world not under their spell, the real lesson of all the Holocausts of the 20th Century has not been lost. To the rest of the world not held under the spell of the magicians of Holocaustism, the lesson learned has been that irrespective of whether atrocities were committed by Marxist Christians in Germany or by Marxist Jews in Russia does not matter, but rather that the blood of humanity which has been rendered so worthless does not appreciate or depreciate in value in accordance with its racial origin. As such, for the gangsters at the ADL, JDL, AIPAC, JINSA, and all the other crime families of Marxist Zionism whose job it is to elevate the Jewish blood shed in WWII to a level of superiority over all others, (and in particular over that blood which their cousins in Israel shed in Palestine) betrays what are the detestable traits found in the practitioners of master race ideology, an ideology which they in perfect hypocritical fashion condemn in others who oppose their agenda. And as sickening as such convoluted and contradictory logic is, it is worse when considered that many of the individuals who make the pretense of fighting for the interests of their people, individuals who have been inflicted with what is best termed racial narcissism have themselves been willing participants in bringing to bear the same Holocaust whose historical importance they now use as a vehicle for their own enrichment and empowerment.

"The antisemites will become our most loyal friends, the antisemites nations will become our allies." (One Palestine Complete, p. 47)

For those who have been given an extra sized serving of Holocaust History over the period of the last 4 decades, the above quote would appear to have originated with Hitler or one of his fellow travellers. In its initial appearances, one can imagine a group of Nazi thugs whispering amidst winks and nods to each other about the "Final Solution" that would rid them of all their problems and fulfill all their sick, racist daydreams. The reality of the matter, however, is that its origin resides with the godfather of the Zionist movement, Theodore Herzl.

The reader should not be surprised to see that Herzl, (considered by many in modern Jewry to be a greater savior of the Jewish people than Moses himself) would author such sentiments. His statement reveals what has historically been a secretly nursed hatred for the Jewish people which has been entertained by those occupying positions in their leadership for the last 2,000 years. Historically, they are individuals who have schemed and plotted for their own benefit, using those under them as stepping stones in their ascent to power. Whether their leadership has been religious or secular in nature, they have over the centuries of the Diaspora planted the seeds of suffering which would later blossom into the same anti-semitic presecutions by which they have advanced their power. Tragically, those who have drunk from the poisoned well of Zionist Marxism and who have elevated men like Herzl and others to positions of sainthood and respectability do not realize what an injustice they are doing to themselves and those who follow after them. If the members of modern day Jewry were truly concerned with isolating what have been the root causes of their persecutions and suffering, they would then come to the undeniable conclusion that it has been their leadership which has been the source of their suffering for the last 2 milleniae. From the Pharisees of the Sanhedrin to the Pharisees at the ADL, it has been the racist, exclusivist mindset entertained by those in leadership positions which have been the cause of friction between Jew and Gentile which has led to anti-Semitism. Being that, historically speaking, persecution of the Jewish people has been good for business for the likes of Herzl and others, therefore it should come as no surprise to find them rubbing their hands greedily in expectation of what has been for them a reliable source of enrichment and propagandistic revenue. And as diabolocal as such scheming appears to be when it exists merely in the theoretical stages, more so is it when it is moved from the drawing table to the production line, for in addition to those who theorized, such as Herzl, there are those as well who were directly responsible for the same suffering and persecution which has become the lifeblood of the Holocaust religion. Besides those ardent Zionists who helped finance Hitler's rise to power (exemplified by Jewish banking interests, including those of the Warburgs, Rothshields, and others) more dastardly is the history of those who refused to help those Jews who were suffering under the Holocaust as it was occurring.

"About the cries coming from your country, we should know that all the Allied nations are spilling much of their blood, and if we do not sacrifice any blood, by what right shall we merit coming before the bargaining table when they divide nations and lands at the war's end? For only with blood shall we get the land."

The cold, calculating, ambitious words of the above quote illustrate what was the willingness of Zionist Marxism to participate in the suffering of the Jews for the purpose of furthering their cause. These demonic sentiments are none other than those which were annunciated by representatives of the World Zionist Congress, the most powerful Zionist group in the world at the time. It was a response sent to Michael Ben Weissmandl, a Rabbi who, after being taken prisoner by the Nazis in Slovakia, worked out an arraingement with his captors for the release of tens of thousands of Jews upon payment in the amount of $50,000.00 to officials of the Third Reich. The response he received from Nathan Shwalb, representative of the World Zionist Congress, clearly shows what was a deliberate effort on the part of Marxist Zionism to participate in the suffering of European Jewry for the purposes of increasing their leverage and power. In addition to this, it has been chronicled with equal clarity the cooperation that took place between the Third Reich and the leaders of the Zionist movement for the transfer of almost 1 million Jews to the now infamous death camps in return for the release of a few thousand who were ardent followers of Zionism and considered to be good prospects for the future state of Israel. In addition to these and other nauseating depictions of betrayal and duplicity, the history of the event also reveals what was the involvement of Zionism in acts of terrorism and murder, manifested in bombings of Synagogues and assassinations against anti-Zionist Jews, acts which were then exploited for their propagandistic value in driving Jews into the protective, loving arms of Zionism.

The instances of Jewish leaders executing violence and subterfuge against their own for the purposes of furthering the interests of Zionism are too numerous in number to discount. And as surely as Hitler's remaining henchmen were rounded up and subjected to the justice of the Nuremburg Trials, so too should have been those individuals who held the seats of power in the Zionist organizations and who (for the purposes of consolidating power among themselves) conspired to subject world Jewry to the now infamous instances of inhumanity and suffering. And yet, these historical accounts and many others of similar stripe are conspicuously not mentioned when the ghouls who operate the ADL, JDL, and other organs of espionage and propaganda for Israel's benefit maintain what has become a state of hightened hysteria concerning the ever looming spectre of anti-Semitism and its history. And if a seldom mentioned history has now indicted those individuals who have acted as cannibals upon the suffering of their own people, reducing their victims to a state of sub-humanity who are of no worth outside of that which brings political power, it should then be easy to see how the same individuals would be willing to inflict misery upon those not of their own family as well.

It is within this context therefore one comes to grasp what is the sickeningly apparent reality concerning the peddlersof Holocaustism and the disciples over whom they hold sway. The picture which is fleshed out in clearly discernable images is one of duplicity, avariciousness, and hypocrisy of Apocalyptic proportions. The truth is that the lessons of the Holocaust have been lost on these individuals, and their presence in the dialogue concerning human rights and persecution is as out of place as would be the presence of the Klu Klux Klan in a forum concerning the civil rights of African Americans. As such, society must conclude that all their public displays of outrage over inhumanity and suffering are nothing more than scripted words that have no sincerity behind them, which is revealed not only in the history of what they have done to their own, but as well in the racial hatred they have nurtured against the Palestinians whom they view as impediments to their ascent to power.

"One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail." --Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994

"May the Holy Name visit retribution on the Arab heads, and cause their seed to be lost, and annihilate them." It is forbidden to have pity on them. We must give them missiles with relish, annihilate them. Evil ones, damnable ones." During a sermon preceding the 2001 Passover holiday by the influential Israeli Rabbi Ovadia Yosef: Ha'aretz April 12, 2001

"[The Palestinians] are beasts walking on two legs." Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, speech to the Knesset, New Statesman, June 25,1982.

"...the need to sustain the character of the state which will henceforth be Jewish...with a non-Jewish minority limited to 15 percent. I had already reached this fundamental position as early as 1940 [and] it is entered in my diary." Joseph Weitz, head of the Jewish Agency's Colonization Department. From "Israel: an Apartheid State" by Uri Davis, p. 5.

"The blood of the Jewish people is loved by the Lord; it is therefore redder and their life is preferable." Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, head of the Kever Yossev Yeshiva (school of Talmud) in Nablus. He was later quoted in praise of the infamous machine-gunning to death of 40 Palestinian worshippers by Baruch Goldstein, that it was "a fulfillment of a number of commands of Jewish religious law...Among Goldstein's good deeds, as enumerated, are...taking revenge on non-Jews, extermination of the non-Jews who are from the seed of Amalek...and the sanctification of the Holy Name."

"There is no such thing as a Palestinian people... It is not as if we came and threw them out and took their country. They didn't exist." Golda Meir, in a statement to The Sunday Times, 15 June 1969.

In the post Holocaust age of sensitivity to political speech that even whiffs slightly of what is the ugliness of racist sentiments, the fact that members of Israel's ruling classes are and have been able to utter such abominations and not be called to account for them betrays what is the hypocrisy which flows like rivers through the veins of today's Zionist organizations. More outrageous is the fact that these same individuals who have brought themselves to the centers of political power by riding atop the waves of condemnation for the inhumanity of Nazi racism are willing to embrace the very same Beast which they now make a show of despising. In the above quotes, (which are but a small sample of what exists) a simple rearraingement of the wording to indicate that the authors were Germans talking about Jews would have resulted in world-wide condemnation by the very same Zionist organizations who today have enshrined and lionized those among them who were bold and brash enough to voice the same sentiments in public. To simply designate this as hypocracy is not sufficient, for in reality it is criminal, and on the scale that deserves the same condemnation from history as was showered upon those who were the infamous henchmen of the Third Reich.

The statements, as ugly as they and the sentiments which they betray are, can be said to be merely the tip of the iceberg when compared to the actions which have accompanied them since the birth of Zionism. The list of war crimes perpetrated by the New Third Reich, Israel, wrought against the peoples of the Middle East are crimes which date back to the early years immediately following the Balfour Declaration up to the present, and are clear examples of a nation and its people who are afflicted with the same poison of race-conscious Marxism as existed in Nazi Germany. In the same manner as the deluded people of Germany sat back and justified the actions taken by their government with regard to the extermination of the state's enemies, in like manner so do the citizens of Israel and her supporters abroad in their justification of Israel's extermination of the Arab peoples who dare to sit on the land which was given to them by divine mandate 2000 years ago. Today's disciples of Zionist butchery, who have made as a pillar in their discipleship the condemnation of the defense given by the German people following WWII that "if only we had known, something would have been done," cannot make the same claim concerning the plight of the Palestinians whose concentration camp existence is visible for all to see today. In allowing the men, women and children of Palestine to be degraded to the status of untermenschen as were many of the present inhabitants of Israel in WWII Europe, they have ignored what were the lessons which history has painstakingly sought to impart upon humanity concerning racism and the persecution which inevitably accompanies it. In such a manner, by facilitating the extermination of the "cockroaches" and "beasts" of Palestine as well as subjecting them in the meantime to a daily life of sickness, starvation, violence and fear, they spit on the graves of all those who perished in the Holocaust at the hands of thugs who worked in concert for the furtherance of bloody Marxism, whether it was in the form of Nazism or Zionism.

Those who today are riding atop the Beast known as Marxist Zionism, and who imagine themselves as occupying a place of such power that is impervious to defeat should think again. This hypocricy which manifests itself by those who are forced and pretend to worship Israel and her people, (as personified by those nations of non-Jewish lackeys who today bow reverently before the history of their suffering) is a tenuous and transitory condition. With this in mind, everyone involved who has, for the purposes of furthering the interests of Israel, exploited the event known as the Holocaust and the infamy that it represents should recognize that at some point the clock will run out on them, and along with that their luck. Being that everyone involved has by virtue of their self interested motives long ago shed any sense of honesty or integrety, (be it in their words, deeds, or sentiments) it can be therefore safely said that their sentiments are unreliable at best. Given that today's policies which are propped up by what is in reality a forced sentimentality towards the people of Israel and her suffering means that at some point the world will abandon those sentiments which are not rooted in genuine concern. As such, the wider the war becomes between Israel and her enemies, the more havoc which is wrought upon the world as a result of her beligerent behavior, the less willing will her supporters in gentile nations be willing to run to her defense. And with this in mind, those who use the charge of anti-Semitism and the suffering of the victims of the Holocaust as a bludgeon to silence critics of Israel should recognize that inevitably the value of their currency, (the charge of anti-Semitism) will eventually lose all its purchasing power, at which point they will then be left to the tender mercies of those whom they have bullied now for 5 decades with its use.

Let the world hear no more from the mouths of the Zionist organizations who bewail the death of six million Jews and at the same time cheer the Holocaust of the Arabs in the Middle East. They have demonstrated themselves by such contradictory sentiments to be the dregs of humanity, without an ounce of the same decency which they accuse their critics of not having, an absence of which they attempt to conceal by their pretended condemnation of Hitler's atrocities. In truth the tears they pretend to shed over the murder of millions in WWII might as well be tears of joy for all the sincerity that is behind them. In their insistance upon elevating the suffering and well-being of their cousins in Israel over the rest of the peoples in the Middle East (and in the rest of the world, for that matter), they have revealed themselves to be vampires and ghouls without an ounce of soul left in them, dispossessed of the qualities of compassion and justice which separate man from beast. In their insistance upon sanctifying the violence and duplicity with which the humanity of the Middle Eastern peoples is violated, denying in the process the existence of their suffering and misery, the High Priests of Marxist Zionism have become carbon copies of the same Holocaust deniers whom they castigate today through their effective infrastructures of propaganda. In the meantime, the world might as well prepare itself for the new era which is quickly approaching as a result of Zionism's hatred for mankind, an era in which will be asked the same questions concerning the Holocaust of the Arabs (Muslim and Christian) as were asked concerning the Holocaust of the Jews:

How could you? How could you just sit by and do nothing? Where is your humanity? Where is your decency?

At which point the world, condemned by its foolishness in allowing the vampires of Marxist Zionism to again drown humanity in its own blood will have to sit there, unable to say anything in its defense other than "I was just following orders." If it should be said that the lessons of the Holocaust should be reduced to one, all encompassing, non-discriminating dictum, it is that human suffering at the hands of a group of thugs who stand to gain by such suffering is a crime. The type of blood which flows in the veins of brutality's victims should not have an exchange rate attached to it by virtue of which race it designates. The one truth that should be enshrined forever in monuments and movies should be that misery which has been authored by racism or political ambition is a crime anywhere and at anytime. And with this in mind, those who would raise the importance of Jewish suffering over the suffering of others should be seen as the frauds that they are, and therefore let the world disregard without hesitation all the feigned sentimentality that they make in their passionate yet disingenuous condemnation of crimes against humanity.

As for the rest of the world, it should begin the long overdue abandonment of the system of weights and measures which it has adopted with regards to human suffering. Such a system is nothing more than a convoluted violation of the laws of decency, a backwards attempt to quantify and qualify human suffering through the use of maniacal formulae, genetic calculations and other methods of junk science. The followers of such a system, despite their perceived power and respectability, are by definition nothing more than academecians in the now defunct Flat-Earth Society who deserve neither consideration no respect. Amidst their outrageous exhortations for the execution of violence upon all those whom they have deemed to be "beasts walking on two legs," instead let what remains of humanity understand that blood is red everywhere, without any respect paid to the veins which carry it.

As such, let the world finally rid itself of the sickness of racism which has been the author of so much suffering. Let humanity once and for all drive a wooden stake into the heart of all political thought which embraces the heresy of master-race ideology, and let mankind finally grasp the reality that all holocausts and institutions of human suffering are vile, even those which bear the distinction of being one less than six million.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

One Less Than Six Million is an excerpt of the work entitled The Beast Unmasked...Israel Without Her Mascara which is due to be released shortly. Mark Glenn is also the author of Not My Words, But Theirs...A Christian American's Defense of Middle Eastern Culture and its People.

The website for the book may be accessed at www.notmywords.com. The author may be reached at mglenn@mediamonitors.org