SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (29336)11/7/2004 6:02:47 PM
From: Sidney Reilly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93284
 
Oh right. I figured Diebold would confess to their voter fraud activities on their home page!! duuuuhhhhh It's says that vote tallies are stored in multiple locations as the votes are cast. What it doesn't say is that there is not the same level of security for the tallies stored at multiple locations. The back-ups have a declining security protocol. Also programs can have back doors and how long would it take watch dog groups to read several million lines of code to find the back doors? There is just too much opportunity for fraud with computer voting. paper, checked by people is safer from fraud. And the electronic voting gave Bush substantial more votes as compared to exit polls 100% of the time. It all smells like rotten fish.



To: jlallen who wrote (29336)11/7/2004 8:32:53 PM
From: JBTFD  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
They are NOT audited. That is the problem. The process the may call an "audit" is a pathetic joke.

blackboxvoting.org

They've got schmucks like Shawn Southworth passing the machines without even checking whether they were likely to get hacked.

Dollar for dollar, it's a lot cheaper to hack into the vote tabulator and switch some votes than it is to actually change people's minds.

I can "certify" that you're a genius. It doesn't mean sh*t.