Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (211017)	11/8/2004 1:51:17 AM
From: beach_bum	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571864

"No, it doesn't say anywhere in the Bible that interracial marriage is prohibited." I wonder how did pull this stunt for so long, before it was banned ? Its probably tied to slavery. I'll look further into it, but it smells of religion to me. "As long as you have a Christian majority in the U.S., it's not likely you'l find many people that will agree to the destruction of the core Christian values of this country. That's not a judgement, it's just my opinion." That's reasonable. But then we should call ourself a christian nation and not pretend to be otherwise. Bum.

To: RetiredNow who wrote (211017)	11/8/2004 3:41:32 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571864

But marriage is Christian and I don't want that institution blemished and the 84% of Americans in this country don't want it either. So I'll ask again. What's the difference between a co-ed marriage and a gay civil union, other than the word "marriage". Is it OK if the civil union gay pair get all of the legal ramifications of a co-ed marriage, but they can't call it a "marriage"? Just trying to figure what all the huff is about!!