Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (13575)	11/9/2004 11:07:53 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20773

"1.Preemptive war with lies to initiate it" Although your perception of me is completely wrong, the above double lie you posted is mainly what I spend my time debunking. And I am certain you have made statements similar to this in the past & I have provided you with factually accurate evidence proving them lies back then. Yet you still post those lies as though they are still true. How can you have a preemptive war when Iraq was egregiously in violation of the Gulf War Cease Fire Agreement? And who lied? The Senate Intelligence Committee & Bob Woodwards book proved that no one in the Bush Admin (including Bush) lied us into war with Iraq. Perhaps you have secret evidence that no one else has. Care to link me to it? I'll be glad to link you to real evidence that once again proves your statement to be nothing but lies perpetrated by liberal Democrats & the MSM.

To: Suma who wrote (13575)	11/9/2004 12:51:46 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

"5.The Arctic is warming and ice melting. The poor Polar Bears have no place to go... and Bush removed our Kyoto accord agreement which releases smoke stack emissions." You really need to wean yourself from liberal propaganda. Bush did not "remove our Kyoto accord agreement which releases smoke stack emissions". Care to link me to evidence that remotely substantiates that blatant lie? This is more liberal propaganda that is widely accepted as fact by people like you. Why is that? FWIW, Bush rejected the KYOTO treaty as "flawed" & had solid scientific backing for his decision. And the Senate, including John Kerry, rejected the Kyoto treaty by a 95-0 vote in 1997. I bet you didn't know that. Are you aware that our air & water is cleaner now than before Bush took office? I didn't think so. If it is such rock solid fact, why are tens of thousands of scientists worldwide against the Kyoto treaty? Message 19652233 Message 19652283 wordiq.com unc.edu capmag.com theage.com.au usatoday.com fcpp.org dev.siliconinvestor.com thebatt.com dev.siliconinvestor.com fff.org heritage.org foxnews.com.edgesuite.net sitewave.net dev.siliconinvestor.com insightmag.com dev.siliconinvestor.com fact-index.com dev.siliconinvestor.com washingtontimes.com issues2000.org dev.siliconinvestor.com sitewave.net ctv.ca issues2000.org lavoisier.com.au junkscience.com tuftsprimarysource.org alcaidecafe.com Please don't think for a second I agree with your POV on #2, 3 or 4. I don't. I just saw #1 & #5 as obvious liberal sponsored propaganda.