Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (211265)	11/9/2004 5:49:48 PM
From: brushwud	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573432

I keep reading that Kerry's discharge from the Navy is suspect...I am curious as to just where these ideas come from... Meanwhile are erst while President has still gotten away with that lapse of time when he did not present himself for duty. This has been established in the same manner as those statements about Kerry.. Without documentation. Without whatever it takes to prove the truth. In Bush's case, he authorized that his entire military record be made public. Terry McAuliffe and Teresa Heinz Kerry have suggested that Bush was AWOL or a draft dodger and various attempts have been made to find documents which might support such ideas, but no one contests that Bush eventually received an honorable discharge. In Kerry's case, he never authorized that his entire military record be made public, so there is no public record of any discharge. This has led various people to infer that his discharge might have been less than honorable. The difference between the two cases is that while some suspect that a document might exist to show that Bush's service was substandard, everyone knows that a document does exist which might show that Kerry's service was substandard, but he didn't allow anyone to see it.

To: Suma who wrote (211265)	11/9/2004 6:39:40 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573432

kerry testified that he met with the vietcong in paris in 1970 during his 1971 senate testimony. I doubt you're interested since you weren't interested in kerry saying he wanted to fuel Iran's nuclear reactor.......

To: Suma who wrote (211265)	11/9/2004 6:54:19 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573432

ALL of these posts are of little relevance now as the election is over however, I am curious as to just where these ideas come from.. Who said them.. Proof of the statement as it were as they are constantly besmirching Kerry....and his reputation ... what's left of it after the SwiftVets..strangulation of him. Suma, they could find zero evidence then and still can't. Kerry's navy documents back up his distinguished career. Bush's pay documents on the other hand did show his absence for several months as did the dropping his active flight status. Al