Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (13593)	11/10/2004 7:35:18 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

Sorry, edit time lapsed before I noted I worded it very poorly. I should have said, "You have put your faith in junk science that cannot prove there is actually global warming that will continue unabated into the future, let alone the root cause." "Say the word and it will be my pleasure to destroy that particular illusion of yours in no time at all." "The word". <gg> FWIW, I'm not interested in more junk science. There exists no model that can recreate our past global weather & temps, where known data actually exists. None! ZERO! How do you expect me to buy into a theoretical model that is proven to be flawed? One that will have input into it purely speculative data about future trends for thousands, if not millions of data points. Show me a model that can perfectly recreate past known weather & temps on a global scale using known data. When that happens I'll listen to their purely speculative theories about the future, but I will still be skeptical. Until then it is junk science fostered by people more interested in environmentalism than pure science. Ö¿Ö