Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (189)	11/10/2004 10:20:38 AM
From: Wayners	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224713

I'd like to see some proposals on how to get around the Constitutional scrutiny. I'm not up on what sank it last time. Perhaps Congress simply needs to be required to have an up down vote on every single line item, even if it takes all day to do it. Didn't know 82 vetoes were used by Clinton to save $2B. Didn't think it got that far before it got porked. No pun intended. Of course Sen. Byrd is at the top of the porkers list and was one of those Dems that sued along with Waxman and other non-patriots. They trade pork for special favors and illegal influence peddling so if you take away the pork, you take away their perks.