SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (211380)11/10/2004 2:07:52 PM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571188
 
It is not important how Canada imagines it sets prices. The reality is that they are free loaders coasting off of American citizens who are paying for the R & D which Canada is not paying. If you stop protecting the rights of drug companies to make some profit, there will be no new drugs.

The ban should be lifted, therefore, not to encourage reimportation, which isn't likely to happen, but simply to allow market practices to surface. Today, with their high-profit American market protected, companies don't have to bargain hard abroad. The ban shields them, allowing them to claim they have to accept foreign price controls. Practically, Americans are subsidizing socialized medical systems abroad.


The first paragraph is yours. The second is from the article. I agree with the second. But it disagrees with the first (yours). You seem to agree with both. Free markets and profit protection don't jive.

BTW, how Canada values drugs is very important...let's not go there. We have enough confusion.

The EU still bans contracts which would enable companies to restrict supply to non-cooperative countries. Then you might end up with laws in those countries allowing their local cloners to clone new brand name drugs and flooding the world wide market. The net result would still be the elimination of financial incentive to innovate. The mess created could take decades to work its way through the WTO. After all, the EU still maintains (anti US beef import) restrictions ruled illegal in 1998 (I think is was 1998).

The article claims that the WTO can manage. I think so too. The world is increasingly a unitized market place driving to common laws.

Al