Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (659419)	11/10/2004 6:30:28 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Respond to of 769670

Sure... why not? But to be very clear on this, I'm not talking about a U.S. company... I think a U.S. company should have its account in the U.S., I'm only referring to a company that does exclusive offshore business, then the company isn't really a U.S. company and is therefore not subject to the U.S. tax laws, the I.R.S.'s jurisdiction ends at the beach... let's take Heinz for example... they have 46 offshore factories, employ only foreign people to work in them, they pay those employees the currency in that country to work for them... what business is it of the U.S. what kind of income is made by those factories? This is the fake issue which kerry was trying to sell to the voters... GZ