Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (151484)	11/11/2004 11:38:15 AM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Um. Has anybody asserted moral superiority more consistently and persistently that W and his faithful followers? If so, I missed it. W wanted a war in Iraq, apparently from the minute he took office, and he seized 9/11 as the perfect pretext to get the war he wanted all along. Some people thing that's really cool, others differ. Those that differ usually get compared to Neville Chamberlain, but that's life.

To: michael97123 who wrote (151484)	11/11/2004 6:37:59 PM
From: Noel de Leon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You continue with ad hominem arguments instead of sticking to the subject. 1) When will the US pay its debt to the UN?. 2) Is the lack of funding a part of the peace keeping problem? 3) Will Bush IIs fundamentalist attitude towards birth control and abortion exacerbate the problems of the third world? 4) Will the Iraq war reduce or increase terrorism in the world? 5) Will Bush IIs attitude towards stem cell research be one more point in Bush IIs position in history as a know nothing? 1) probably not 2) yes 3) yes 4) increase 5) yes