SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/11/2004 9:39:42 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
America’s privilege, the world’s worry

Nov 10th 2004
From The Economist Global Agenda

The dollar plumbed new depths against the euro this week. The greenback’s fall has unnerved European policymakers. But it is their Asian counterparts who have most reason to worry





CHARLES DE GAULLE, founder of France’s fifth republic, famously resented America’s paramount position in the global economy of the 1960s. The United States, he complained, enjoyed an “exorbitant privilege”. Because its currency, the dollar, served as the world’s reserve asset, America could live beyond its means, unconstrained by the periodic shortages of foreign exchange that haunted other, less privileged nations. Nicolas Sarkozy, France’s spirited finance minister, wants to inherit de Gaulle’s mantle as president of the fifth republic. Though somewhat smaller in stature than the great general, both physically and politically, Mr Sarkozy seems to share his outsized resentment of America’s economic privileges.

Mr Sarkozy has more to envy than de Gaulle ever had. Today’s America lives beyond its means more flagrantly than ever before. Its government will spend about $427 billion more than it raises in taxes this year. The nation as a whole is running a deficit of $571.9 billion on its current account with the rest of the world. These twin deficits, Mr Sarkozy points out, weigh heavily on the dollar. The currency’s fall, interrupted in February, has resumed. On Monday November 8th, it plumbed a new low against the euro of close to $1.30. Only if America restrains its deficits will the markets regain confidence in the dollar, Mr Sarkozy warned. “This is a unanimous message from the Europeans and the International Monetary Fund that we send to the United States.” On Wednesday, the dollar dipped again, this time breaching the $1.30-per-euro mark.

Mr Sarkozy no doubt fears that his American counterparts are quite happy to watch the dollar fall. Their professed commitment to a “strong dollar policy” might disguise a policy of benign neglect. America’s net overseas liabilities amounted to 23% of GDP at the end of last year, close to the record debts it amassed in 1894, according to Ken Rogoff and Maurice Obstfeld of the National Bureau of Economic Research. Crucially, the bulk of these debts are denominated in dollars. Thus America may be sorely tempted to dishonour its dollar debts, not by defaulting on them, but by devaluing them.

The immediate casualties of such a policy would be America’s East Asian creditors. By the end of last year, Asian central banks held $1.89 trillion of foreign reserves, the vast bulk of them in dollars. If these reserves lost value, Asian economies would suffer an almighty capital loss in domestic-currency terms. A recent study by the New York Federal Reserve counted the costs. If the Chinese yuan were to appreciate by 10% against the dollar (and other reserve currencies), China would suffer a capital loss worth almost 3% of GDP, the study found. If the won rose by 10%, South Korea would suffer similarly. The toll would be even greater in Singapore (10% of GDP) and Taiwan (8%).

To avert such an appreciation, Asian central banks would have to amass ever greater holdings of dollars. But this would only expose them to greater capital losses down the road. Alternatively, they might seek to avoid the consequences of a dollar fall, by diversifying into other reserve currencies, such as the euro. But that would only bring the dollar crashing down all the more quickly. In other words, Asian central banks are caught in an awkward dilemma: either they try to break the dollar’s fall, or they try to escape from underneath its collapse.

Despite this dilemma, Asia’s central bankers created less of a fuss on Monday than Europe’s did. Jean-Claude Trichet, president of the European Central Bank (ECB), described the dollar’s fall against the euro as unwelcome and “brutal”, repeating the melodramatic language he adopted in January. But why all the worry? In some ways, the stronger euro will do Mr Trichet’s job for him. It will contain euro-area inflation, which has remained stubbornly above the ECB’s ceiling of 2%. It will offset the higher dollar price of oil—last month’s worry du jour. And if the euros in their pockets gain in value, European households might be more willing to spend them, overcoming the caution that has held the European recovery back for much of this year.

It is true that the dollar has never been weaker against Europe’s single currency since its birth in 1999. But as recently as 1997 it was weaker against a basket of the 12 currencies out of which the euro was fashioned. Back then, no one described the dollar’s movements as brutal. Indeed, at times it seems that European resentment of America’s privileges is a little exorbitant.



economist.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/12/2004 12:38:29 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Fed copies and pastes with optimism

forexnews.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/14/2004 11:18:34 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
Gold Bulls’ Three Stages


Adam Hamilton



September 3, 2004

Secular gold bulls have three distinct stages driven by growing investor demand. We examine these stages and their implications for today's gold bull.

As the unofficial end of summer storms in over this long weekend in the States, I find myself pondering the changing demand profiles over the lifespan of a typical secular bull market in gold.



The word secular, which has a dictionary definition of “going on from age to age”, is used to describe any major market trend that runs for a long period of time. For a general mental yardstick, I think that a bull or bear market running for a decade or so lands right smack in the middle of the annals of seculardom.



The Great Gold Bull of the 1970s, for example, ran from 1970 to early 1980, exactly one decade. While gold did not rise in every single year, when you look at a long-term chart (see below) this secular bull market is utterly unmistakable. Secular bulls in general stocks tend to last even longer, usually two decades each, like the Great Stock Bull of the 1980s and 1990s.



Since the average investor really only has four decades in which to build his or her fortune, from the ages of 25 to 65, any trend that runs for a decade or more sure does feel like it is going on from age to age! A secular bull or bear can easily run from a quarter to a half of an entire average investing lifespan. Thus it is unbelievably important to run with these primary trends since getting even one wrong could cost an investor half their investing life. The price for fighting these secular trends is staggeringly high.



On the short end of the measuring stick, I think the absolute minimum amount of time necessary for a trend to attain secular status is three years. If any trend runs for less than three years, then it should be considered cyclical instead of secular. Thus it is pointless to even think in secular terms until a trend has been fire-tested and battle-proven for at least three years. Which brings us to our current gold bull.



On April 2nd, 2001, gold was battered down to a devastating 22-year secular low just under $257. This formed a massive double-bottom with similar gold lows on central-bank gold sales in late summer 1999. Prior to 1999, even in nominal terms gold had not witnessed such dismal prices since 1979, ages and ages ago. At the time in 2001 gold sentiment was understandably horrendous, with high-profile predictions of sub-$200 gold abounding. Yet, as markets are wont to do, gold’s secular trend stealthily changed during its darkest hour.



As I hammer out this essay exactly 41 months to the day later, gold’s glorious new bull market is finally readily apparent to all. From April 2001 to April 2004, the requisite three-year minimum necessary to catapult gold’s current bull market into the elite ranks of seculardom, gold has soared over 66% higher. Since we are already three-and-a-half years into gold’s present bull, we have to start thinking in secular terms. Only then can we begin to understand what wonders might lay ahead for gold investors.



Now naturally the tools used to analyze a strategic secular bull are far different from those used to speculate on short-term tactical trends oscillating within the primary secular trends. While various technicals tools are crucial for short-term tactical speculation, long-term analysis is exclusively dependent on fundamentals.



The most foundational of all the fundamentals is supply and demand. As long as demand exceeds supply, prices will be forced to rise over the long term. This elegant mechanism is the ultimate way that free markets allocate scarce supplies to those most willing to pay for them. Eventually some new equilibrium price is found where supply equals demand and the gold market perfectly clears, with no long-term surplus or deficit.



As the invisible hand of the free markets, really the collective buying and selling decisions of every gold player on the planet, guides prices, signals are sent to gold producers, consumers, and investors. The higher the gold price goes, the more gold producers want to sell. Higher gold prices lead to higher supplies of gold as miners around the world rush to capitalize on the increased profit margins on their product.



Of course mining more gold is nowhere near as easy as producing an additional copy of Microsoft Windows! Finding new gold deposits that are large enough to mine is exceedingly difficult, and even once they are discovered it takes years to dig shafts and spin a new mine up to operational speed. For this reason, historically the total global gold supply only grows by an average of a couple percent or so each year. Faster growth is impossible at almost any gold price due to the extreme difficulty and huge capital costs necessary to bring new gold deposits to market.



Thus, on the gold production end supplies are very inelastic to price. Regardless of how high the gold price goes there will not be a flood of newly mined gold as ramping up global gold production fast is simply not viable. But there is another potential supply of gold beyond mining, which comes from investors choosing to sell gold that they have previously purchased.



Since gold is rarely destroyed, virtually all the gold ever mined still exists in various forms today, from bars sitting in secure vaults to jewelry adorning beautiful women around the world. Investors who own this gold can generally be divided into two distinct groups with vastly different motivations, official central banks and private investors. As these investors choose to sell their gold, it can cause additional supply to come onto the markets at various times.



Central banks rightfully see gold, the ultimate money over six millennia of human history, as a threat to their fragile fiat-paper currencies, so they tend to act irrationally. Rather than buying low and selling high like a private investor, central banks buy and sell at the wrong times. Central banks tend to exacerbate secular trends.



At the end of long gold bears central banks wrongly assume that gold is finally becoming worthless so they sell and drive the bear lower. At the end of long gold bulls they worry that their particular fiat paper does not have enough gold backing so they buy and force the bull higher. If the goofy bureaucrats who ran central banks had to trade for a living, they would soon go broke by selling low and buying high!



While private gold investors tend to fear central banks due to their ominous urban-legend status, I don’t believe central banks have any hope of controlling gold action over longer periods of time. It is believed that about 150,000 metric tonnes of gold have been painstakingly chiseled out of the bowels of the Earth during all of world history, and only about 20%, or 30,000 tonnes, is controlled by various central banks today. While 20% is certainly not trivial, it is the private investors that control the other 80% that really hold gold’s destiny in their hands.



Since newly mined gold can only grow total world supplies by a couple percent a year at best, and central banks only control 20% of the above-ground gold and tend to buy and sell at exactly the wrong times lengthening secular trends, the real force to be reckoned with in the gold world is private investors. It is to these private investors, people around the world like you and I, that we must look to understand secular gold bulls.



The key to a secular gold bull is the demand or supply that private investors generate worldwide as they buy or sell gold. It isn’t mining supplies, it’s not central banks, but it is the collective gold transactions of hundreds of millions or even billions of individual investors worldwide buying and selling gold that ultimately sets its price and determines its fortunes.



I believe that the collective demand trends of private gold investors worldwide effectively divide secular gold bulls into three distinct demand-driven stages. In order to understand these stages and their implications, we first have to understand the peculiar nature of gold investment demand.



Normally in economics, the lower the price of something the higher the general demand for it. This is evident everywhere in society today, but perhaps especially so in technology. Twenty years ago when a computer cost $3000+, there weren’t a lot of families with computers. Prices were high and demand was low. Yet as prices gradually fell over the years demand increased far beyond the small enthusiast market.



Today with a decent computer for surfing the Web, e-mailing friends, and doing office work only running $600 or so, computers are ubiquitous. While the statistics say they are out there, I have yet to meet a family without at least one computer in their home today. Whether we are talking about computers, pizza, cars, whatever, the lower the price the higher the demand grows for a particular product. This is a normal downward-sloping demand curve.



But with gold, and indeed most other investments, the demand curve is far from normal. As all contrarians know, in the investment world the higher the price of an investment climbs the greater demand becomes! It is all backwards. While virtually no one wanted anything to do with gold near $250 a few years ago, once gold soars to $2500 everyone will want a piece of it. In the financial world higher prices don’t retard demand, instead they actually breed demand!



The higher the price of gold climbs, the more potential investors will become aware of its impressive returns. As they buy in over time, their marginal investment demand will drive gold even higher, putting it on the radar of even more investors worldwide. This investor demand creates a wonderful virtuous circle, with higher gold prices leading to more interest and higher demand which in turn leads back to higher gold prices and feeds the cycle. There is no better advertisement for a particular investment than rising prices, as most investors are not contrarians so they will only chase existing well-established trends.



And remember that private investors collectively control 80% of the world’s gold, so if demand is growing in this realm it is almost irrelevant what the mines can pull or what nefarious machinations the central banks happen to be up to! The whole secular gold game unfolds in terms of private investor demand for gold, as we are collectively the dominating force in the gold market.



Thus it is not only important to realize that it is not mines or central banks that ultimately drive gold prices, but private investor demand, it is also crucial to understand that global gold investment demand only grows with higher gold prices. Using this high-level model of gold supply-and-demand fundamentals, we can divide secular gold bulls into three distinct stages based on pure global investment demand.



Our lone chart this week compares the Great Gold Bull of the 1970s with today’s young secular gold bull. It is divided into the three distinct stages of a secular gold bull, each of which is driven by evolving demand profiles among private gold investors around the world. And, lighting up my own long weekend, I am thrilled that we were able to incorporate our old bull image which has been largely missing in action in recent years. In my book any graph capable of sporting a cartoon bull is a darned good one!





The first important thing to note on this secular gold bull graph is the typical parabolic shape of a secular gold bull. All secular bulls that ultimately culminate in bubbles exhibit this distinctive pattern of price increases continuously accelerating over time. As this yellow parabola shows, this acceleration is almost imperceptible in the early years, picks up dramatically in the middle years, and is breathtaking in the final years. This pattern was also witnessed in both the NASDAQ and S&P 500 as well during their own recent secular bulls.



The left axis of this graph corresponds to the blue line of the Great Gold Bull of the 1970s. Interestingly, since we used monthly data, this 1970s gold bull is even a bit understated. While the all-time monthly high close for gold is under $700 as this graph shows, gold actually soared to $850 per ounce briefly in January 1980 at the top of its last mania!



The right axis defines the red line, which is our current gold bull to date from January 2001 to today in monthly terms. As you can see, the early slopes of this gold bull and the early years of the 1970s Great Gold Bull match remarkably well. Today, just as gold did from 1970 to 1973, it is once again stealthily climbing the initial modest upslope of the yellow parabola. If our current specimen continues to hold the course plotted before it in the 1970s, gold will ultimately trade over thousands of dollars per ounce before this decade ends!



I believe the key to understanding this parabolic shape that all secular bulls ending in bubbles assume is to understand the changing investment demand profiles throughout a secular bull. The constantly accelerating parabolic profile is driven by shifting investment demand over the life of a secular bull. The higher an investment price gets, the higher demand grows and a positive feedback loop is created.



Stages One, Two, and Three of a secular gold bull are defined by the two major slope changes in this standard secular-bull parabolic ascent. Each stage, considered in turn, makes perfect sense when described in terms of global investor demand.



Gold is ultimately money, and during Stage One bulls it trades like another currency. One of the primary reasons why the Stage One upslope is so moderate is that the main reason gold rises initially is due to a devaluation of the dominant currency in which it is priced, obviously the US dollar today. As the US dollar bear has festered in recent years, and as the dollar eroded in the early 1970s, gold is a direct beneficiary of the dollar’s losses. As the dollar grinds lower, the gold/dollar exchange rate rises.



Since Stage One is currency-devaluation driven, the young gold bull is most noticeable in terms of the dominant eroding currency. Since April 2001 gold’s gains have been greatest in the US since it is the US dollar that is devaluing. But from foreign-currency perspectives, such as the Europeans’, gold has traded largely sideways in recent years. Stage One gold bulls witness gains that are roughly one-to-one with currency losses, so they are most evident in local-currency terms.



Now since these early Stage One bulls are only apparent to contrarian investors in the country with the dominant devaluing currency, overall investment demand is low. Not only is gold coming off a multi-decade secular bear so not many folks believe in it, but it has no established momentum so only hardcore contrarians will even consider it. Even in the States the total capital the contrarians command is very small relative to the markets as a whole, so initial gold buying on the local-currency devaluation is rather anemic and makes for a tepid initial upslope.



Now after three or four years of Stage One, Stage Two arrives. Stage Two marks a momentous event when gold decouples from the local-currency devaluation. In the case of our gold bull today, Stage Two will be here when gold starts consistently rising faster than the dollar is able to fall. This key decoupling works on multiple fronts to really kindle investment demand around the world and marks the first significant steepening of the parabola’s upslope.



Locally, the gold and dollar decoupling in Stage Two leads to accelerating US dollar gold prices. This draws in more American investors, who see the 66% gold gains in the past few years compared to stock-market losses over the same period of time. You can already see the great gold marketing machine spinning up, with even CNBC and Fox News having advertisements today heralding the new bull market in gold. The slowly rising prices of Stage One that drew in the contrarians start accelerating and gradually gold becomes known and sought after outside of the small contrarian community.



Even more importantly in Stage Two though, since gold’s gains start outpacing the dollar’s losses gold starts rising in virtually all currencies worldwide! Rather than appearing flatlined, a mere product of the dollar’s misfortune, gold starts showing up on foreign investors’ radars as it consistently carves new local-currency gold highs around the world. And not surprisingly foreign investors, who generally know how fragile governments and fiat currencies truly are, are far more receptive to gold investing and don’t need convincing like Americans.



Gradually these foreign investors out of Asia and Europe start buying gold and global investment demand accelerates. The more global capital that is poured into gold, the faster its price rises tracking the accelerating parabolic upslope. And of course the faster gold’s price rises the more new capital it attracts. This virtuous circle on a global scale is what fuels the strong gains of Stage Two, which provocatively utterly dwarf Stage One. While gold went from $257 to $427, or 66% higher in Stage One so far, it should trade considerably above $1000 before Stage Two ends, or another 134% higher from here!



After five or so years of Stage Two gains, gold has a chance at going ballistic in Stage Three. Stage Three is only ignited if the general public around the world starts growing enamored with gold investing. If you thought the dot-com mania was crazy, wait until you see a global gold rush. All of us humans have an innate lust for gold burning somewhere in our hearts and there is no rush like a gold rush! Gold rushes define speculative manias!



When the gold bull spreads beyond the usual investment class to the general public, so much capital deluges into gold so rapidly that it is blasted parabolic. Naturally a vertical upslope is totally unsustainable and cannot last for much longer than a year at best. Stage Three is a captivating time for the early contrarians who rode the entire gold bull from its early Stage One days to its mania days. Vast gains rapidly multiply, yet a sustained vertical ascent on a long-term chart is a dire warning sign that the party will soon be ending. Contrarians are torn between riding gold “just a little longer” and immediately selling it all.



Not surprisingly the greatest gains of all are found in Stage Three. Extrapolating today’s bull-market data on a 1970s-style gold parabola, gold could easily shoot from $1000 to over $3500 if the public enters and ignites a popular speculative mania. This massive 250% gain in Stage Three alone is roughly twice as great as Stage Two’s 134% and four times as great as Stage One’s 66%! As the parabola model suggests, secular bull gains multiply exponentially until the bubble pops and the mania comes crashing down.



It is crucial to realize that this unfolding secular parabola is totally dependent on only one force, global investment demand for gold. Mines just can’t wrest enough gold free from Earth fast enough to stop this parabola once it is in motion and central banks’ relatively small 20% control of global gold supplies isn’t enough to stop the other 80% when goldlust spreads from contrarians to mainstream investors to ultimately the general public.



And, unlike normal demand profiles, gold investment demand only increases as gold prices march higher in currencies around the world. The higher the gold price goes, the more demand it spawns, at least until the public jumps in, foments a bubble, and all the capital available to chase gold is already in leading to the bubble bursting and the end of the secular bull market.



If you note the transition in the graph above from Stage One to Stage Two, it looks like our current gold bull is almost there. For a variety of reasons I agree and believe that Stage Two is probably right around the corner today. I am even finding increasing empirical evidence in my research suggesting that gold is now preparing to lift into Stage Two leading to a vast surge in global investment demand in the coming years.



If you are interested in this key Stage One to Stage Two transition, please consider subscribing to our acclaimed monthly Zeal Intelligence newsletter.



In the hot-off-the-presses September issue just published this week, I detailed the actual evidence suggesting that Stage Two is near. In addition I discussed the key market development, which you can watch for yourself, that I believe has the highest probability of signaling that Stage Two is upon us. And, as always, our letter is full of actual stock and options trading recommendations to help you ride this secular gold bull to legendary gains. If today’s bull proves true to the parabolic historical form, then the vast majority of profits still lie ahead!



The bottom line is that today’s gold bull, over three years old now, is definitely a secular specimen. Past secular gold bulls unfold in a massive parabolic shape over a decade or so, driven by accelerating global investment demand. This investment demand growth can be divided into three distinct stages driven first by contrarians, then global investors, and ultimately the general public.



So far our current gold bull is tracking this model perfectly. Even better, increasing empirical evidence suggests Stage Two is near so the upslope of this secular gold bull is due to accelerate significantly in the years ahead. Is your capital positioned and ready to ride this accelerating secular gold bull?

zealllc.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/16/2004 5:18:21 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Shadow open market committee

reuters.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/16/2004 5:30:33 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Scudder Looks for Gems Amid the Gold

_____________________________________

Managers Seek 'Valuation Geology' in Their Mining Company Investments

By Edgar Ortega
Bloomberg News
Sunday, November 14

Euan Leckie and Greg Foulis, managers of the top-performing Scudder Gold & Precious Metals Fund, expect to add to their gains with the help of President Bush.

Bush's tax cuts and military spending helped turn a record budget surplus into a record deficit, causing the U.S. dollar to drop and gold prices to rise, Leckie said in an interview from his office at Deutsche Asset Management in Sydney. His reelection represents a "continuation of the policy of large budget deficits," Leckie said.

"That's an overall positive environment for gold," said Leckie, 59, who received a geology degree from the University of Tasmania in 1966. His mutual fund had 88 percent of its assets in gold-mining stocks at the end of September.

The $545.5 million Scudder fund rose at an average annual rate of 27.2 percent during the past five years, the best performance of 22 gold funds tracked by Bloomberg.

Leckie and Foulis, 43, search for mining companies that can increase production and reserves at below-average costs. The approach, which Foulis calls "valuation geology," led them to Placer Dome Inc., Canada's second-largest gold miner, and Ivanhoe Mines Ltd., a Vancouver-based company that is developing a copper and gold mine in Mongolia.

Shares of Placer Dome, the fund's biggest holding, more than doubled since Bush's 2001 inauguration. Gold climbed 64 percent in the same period, closing at $437.90 on Friday.

The U.S. budget deficit swelled to $412.3 billion in the 12 months ended Sept. 30, as costs rose to finance the war in Iraq and homeland security. Before Bush took office, the country had a record surplus of $236.4 billion.

Gold reached a 16-year high of $438.30 an ounce last week. The dollar is down 1.1 percent against the euro since Bush was reelected and down 12.3 percent during the past 12 months. A declining dollar makes gold, which is denominated in the U.S. currency, less costly for holders of other currencies and boosts its attraction as a hedge against declines in U.S. assets.

Bush said during his first press conference after winning reelection that he will press ahead with the war on terrorism and make permanent his $1.85 trillion of tax cuts.

"Gold will test $500 an ounce next year," said Frank Holmes, whose firm manages the U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund, the best-performing gold fund since Bush took office. "The dollar will be under pressure for many years."

Leckie is less sanguine. At a 16-year high, gold prices are "delicately poised," he said. "We could see $450 without a problem next year."

Shares of gold-mining companies have struggled this year because of increasing production costs, said Victor Flores, an analyst at HSBC Securities Inc. in New York. The American Stock Exchange's Gold Miners Index has declined 2.7 percent and the Scudder Fund has dropped 3.7 percent. The U.S. Global fund was up 1 percent.

"People are concerned that fuel and energy costs keep rising," said Flores, who also expects gold to reach $450 an ounce next year.

Leckie and Foulis focus on mining companies with shares that are trading at a discount to the value of their mines.

"We look at the cost structure, potential production schedules and the estimated life of the mine and then ask: Is this an undervalued asset?" said Foulis, who received a degree in geology from New South Wales Institute of Technology in 1984. Foulis worked as a geologist for eight years before becoming a gold analyst at Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. in 1992.

Leckie and Foulis increased their stake in Placer Dome to 8.1 percent of assets on Sept. 30, from 4.5 percent a year earlier. The stock traded for 2.1 times the value of its mines, excluding debt, on Oct. 27, according to analysts at Credit Suisse First Boston. That's 17 percent less than Newmont Mining Corp., CSFB said in a report. Shares of Placer Dome are up 23 percent this year, compared with a decline of 0.3 percent for Newmont. Placer Dome shares closed Friday at $22.30 each and Newmont's stock ended the week at $49.68 per share on the New York Stock Exchange.

The Scudder fund bought shares of Ivanhoe in April 2002 when the company sold shares at $2.73. Proceeds from the sale were used for the Turquoise Hill mine in Mongolia near the Chinese border. Leckie's co-manager at the time, Darko Kuzmanovic, visited the site twice before buying shares. Kuzmanovic has since joined Dallas-based David W. Tice & Associates, where he works as an analyst.

Ivanhoe surged almost five-fold to a record $12.70 on Nov. 3, 2003, as the company reported that its open-pit mine may hold the world's fifth-largest copper and gold reserves. The gain made Ivanhoe the fund's largest holding last year, at one point accounting for more than 10 percent of assets.

Leckie said he started reducing the fund's holdings in Ivanhoe during the fourth quarter of 2003. The fund sold all its shares by June, according to filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, after Ivanhoe's production forecasts fell short of Leckie's estimates.

He's now betting on Crystallex International Corp., a stock he first bought in the fourth quarter of 2003. It's now the fund's fourth-largest holding. Shares of the owner of Venezuela's biggest gold deposit rallied 58 percent in the past three months, as the company released results of drilling tests at its Las Cristinas mine, which has proven and probable reserves of 12.8 million ounces. Crystallex's stock closed Friday at $4.40 per share on the American Stock Exchange.

"It's not easy to find 12 million ounces of gold in one lump that has not yet been developed," said Leckie, whose office is dotted with rocks from the mines he has visited.

© 2004 The Washington Post Company

washingtonpost.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/16/2004 6:17:08 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
A Temporary Phenomenon or Here to Stay?

tonto.eia.doe.gov



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/18/2004 6:18:21 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
UC Berkeley Research Team Sounds 'Smoke Alarm' for Florida E-Vote Count
______________________________________________

By UC Berkeley

Thursday 18 November 2004

Research team calls for investigation.

Today the University of California's Berkeley Quantitative Methods Research Team released a statistical study - the sole method available to monitor the accuracy of e- voting - reporting irregularities associated with electronic voting machines may have awarded 130,000-260,000 or more excess votes to President George W. Bush in Florida in the 2004 presidential election. The study shows an unexplained discrepancy between votes for President Bush in counties where electronic voting machines were used versus counties using traditional voting methods - what the team says can be deemed a "smoke alarm." Discrepancies this large or larger rarely arise by chance - the probability is less than 0.1 percent. The research team formally disclosed results of the study at a press conference today at the UC Berkeley Survey Research Center, where they called on Florida voting officials to investigate.

The three counties where the voting anomalies were most prevalent were also the most heavily Democratic: Broward, Palm Beach and Miami-Dade, respectively. Statistical patterns in counties that did not have e-touch voting machines predict a 28,000 vote decrease in President Bush's support in Broward County; machines tallied an increase of 51,000 votes - a net gain of 81,000 for the incumbent. President Bush should have lost 8,900 votes in Palm Beach County, but instead gained 41,000 - a difference of 49,900. He should have gained only 18,400 votes in Miami-Dade County but saw a gain of 37,000 - a difference of 19,300 votes.

"For the sake of all future elections involving electronic voting - someone must investigate and explain the statistical anomalies in Florida," says Professor Michael Hout. "We're calling on voting officials in Florida to take action."

The research team is comprised of doctoral students and faculty in the UC Berkeley sociology department, and led by Sociology Professor Michael Hout, a nationally-known expert on statistical methods and a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the UC Berkeley Survey Research Center.

For its research, the team used multiple-regression analysis, a statistical method widely used in the social and physical sciences to distinguish the individual effects of many variables on quantitative outcomes like vote totals. This multiple-regression analysis takes into account of the following variables by county:

* number of voters
* median income
* Hispanic/Latino population
* change in voter turnout between 2000 and 2004
* support for Senator Dole in the 1996 election
* support for President Bush in the 2000 election
* use of electronic voting or paper ballots

"No matter how many factors and variables we took into consideration, the significant correlation in the votes for President Bush and electronic voting cannot be explained," said Hout. "The study shows, that a county's use of electronic voting resulted in a disproportionate increase in votes for President Bush. There is just a trivial probability of evidence like this appearing in a population where the true difference is zero - less than once in a thousand chances."

The data used in this study came from public sources including CNN.com, the 2000 US Census, and the Verified Voting Foundation. For a copy of the working paper, raw data and other information used in the study can be found at: ucdata.berkeley.edu.

truthout.org



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/18/2004 6:51:42 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
LONG VOYAGE HOME
__________________

The games almost finished off their fans, but at last, wow, the Sox have won.

by ROGER ANGELL
The New Yorker
Issue of 2004-11-22

newyorker.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/20/2004 9:08:16 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
"In the precarious hedge-fund bubble, it’s either clean up—or flame out."

newyorkmetro.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/20/2004 11:48:56 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
You Really Should Watch The Dollar--Here's Why

biz.yahoo.com

btw, your OSU team outplayed my Wolverines this afternoon...Congratulations.

-s2@IowaStillPavedTheWayForARoseBowlTrip.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/22/2004 12:25:56 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Hedge Funds Get Half of $46.6 Bln of New Inflows From Advisers

bloomberg.com

Nov. 16 (Bloomberg) -- Hedge funds attracted $46.6 billion during the first nine months of this year and more than half the money went to middlemen who don't personally oversee the funds.

About $26.4 billion poured into so-called funds of funds, according to data compiled by Chicago-based Hedge Fund Research Inc. The funds now account for almost 40 percent of the $890 billion invested worldwide in hedge funds, up from a third in 2002, Hedge Fund Research reported.

With the number of hedge funds more than tripling to 7,100 in the past decade, investors are turning to advisers for help figuring out which funds to buy. U.S. institutions will increase their investments in hedge funds to $300 billion from $60 billion in the next five years, according to a report from Bank of New York Co. and Casey, Quirk & Acito LLC, an investment management consulting firm in New York.

``Pension funds are using fund of fund firms as consultants,'' said David Aldrich, the London-based head of securities industry banking in Europe for Bank of New York. ``It's impossible for pension funds to know all the hedge funds.''

Obtaining advice on which hedge funds to buy has meant lower returns than investors would have received had they bought a fund that mimics the Standard & Poor's 500 Index. Fund of funds generated average annual returns of 8.6 percent since 1993, trailing the 10 percent gain of the S&P 500, including reinvested dividends, according to Hedge Fund Research. They rose 1.8 percent on average during the nine months ended Sept. 30.

``This is a disappointing year from a performance standpoint,'' said Ron Rolighed, director at Harris Alternatives LLC in Chicago, whose $2.5 billion Aurora Offshore Fund Ltd. invests in about 50 funds.

Geneva Conference

About 450 hedge fund executives and investors gather today for three days of meetings in Geneva at the annual Global Alternative Investment Management conference. Executives from Man Group Plc, the world's largest publicly traded hedge fund manager with $39.1 billion of assets, and Permal Group, which ranks among the biggest fund of funds managers with about $18 billion of assets, are expected to be among the attendees.

About a third of the offerings in Hedge Fund Research's database, which tracks 4,000 funds, are fund of funds, an investment concept pioneered in 1962 by mutual fund salesman Bernie Cornfeld.

Foundations, endowments and pension funds have flocked to fund of funds managed by firms such as UBS AG's GAM Ltd. and HFR Europe Ltd. HFR's assets have more than tripled this year to $3.3 billion, according to John Godden, managing director at HFR.

Best and Worst Performers

``Fund of funds have performed as we had hoped,'' said Jonathan Hook, chief investment officer at Baylor University in Waco, Texas, who's scheduled to speak at the GAIM conference.

Baylor University, which has a $710 million endowment, has about $35 million in funds of funds. The value of the portfolio rose 15.6 percent in the 12 months ended Sept. 30, Hook said.

Some pension plans or endowments will start investing in hedge funds through funds of funds, with the expectation that they will move on to individual managers once they've gained experience, said Michael Napoli, who heads the hedge fund group at Santa Monica, California-based Wilshire Associates, which has $2.5 billion in hedge fund assets under advisement from institutions.

``But once they get invested and see the due diligence that's needed, they realize they aren't equipped to do it on their own,'' Napoli said.

Harris Alternatives has provided the best performance this year among managers of the largest and most diversified fund of funds, returning 4.15 percent in the first nine months, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The $1.4 billion RMF Absolute Return Strategies I Ltd. fund of fund, run by London-based Man Group, fell 6.8 percent in the same period, Bloomberg data show. The Man-Glenwood Multi-Strategy Fund Ltd., with $2 billion of assets, declined 0.9 percent.

To contact the reporters on this story:
Katherine Burton in New York at kburton@bloomberg.net and Samantha Lafferty in London at slafferty@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Tim Quinson at tquinson@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: November 16, 2004 01:16 EST



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/22/2004 12:52:41 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Hedge Fund Inflows Top $100 Billion in 2004

investorsoffshore.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/22/2004 12:56:48 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Hedge fund returns could be misleading

usatoday.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/22/2004 12:58:48 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Dollar Outlook Most Bearish in 18 Months, Survey Says

bloomberg.com

<<... Nov. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Currency traders, investors and strategists are more bearish on the dollar than at any time in the past 18 months, a Bloomberg News survey indicates.

Seventy percent of the 54 strategists, investors and traders polled on Nov. 19 from Tokyo to New York advised selling the dollar against the euro, the most since May 2003. Two-thirds advised selling it against the yen. The U.S. currency fell to a record $1.3074 per euro on Nov. 18 and dropped to the lowest in more than four years versus the yen the next day.

A meeting of Group of 20 finance ministers and central bankers yesterday omitted any statement to bolster the dollar. The Federal Reserve and the U.S. government will tolerate a weaker dollar to narrow the record deficit in the current account, the broadest measure of trade, according to Michael Rosenberg, senior strategist and managing director in New York at Harbert Management Corp., an investment firm with about $5 billion in assets.

``The Fed recognizes it's inevitable'' that the dollar weaken, said Rosenberg, former head of global currency research at Deutsche Bank AG. ``People are jumping on board; it's clear the dollar's going down. We could be at $1.35 to $1.40 very quickly.'' He said his firm is placing bets on a drop in the U.S. currency compared with the euro and the yen...>>



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/22/2004 1:01:10 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Gold prices hit a fresh 16-year high last week, with the yellow metal yet again a proxy for a lower dollar. So with the US authorities seemingly having embarked on a weak dollar policy, can investment in gold go wrong?

ameinfo.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/22/2004 11:31:48 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Where Is the ETF’s Gold?

news.goldseek.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (66934)11/22/2004 11:50:33 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Templeton offers unique perspective
_____________________________________

By SCOTT BURNS
Universal Press Syndicate
Nov. 21, 2004, 12:44AM

chron.com

Sir John Templeton's office in Lyford Cay is far from the T-shirt shops, cruise boats and diamond dealers of Nassau. It's also a world apart from the glitzy Atlantis Resort and Casino on Paradise Island. Now 92, the global value investor still manages his investments and oversees the activities of his foundations.

As you will see from his answers in this exclusive interview, Sir John is positive about the long-term future but very cautious about current valuation levels for stocks, bonds, the dollar and real estate.

In the last year you've expressed concern over U.S. housing prices. Would you explain why?


Prices of houses in all nations for centuries have fluctuated above and below cost of reproduction. In the United States now, in most major cities, homes can be sold for far higher prices than reproduction costs. Several times in my lifetime, house prices have been far below reproduction costs and such cycles are likely to continue.

In recent trading, the dollar has fallen significantly and Europeans are less worried than usual, largely because a cheaper dollar means lower priced oil for Europe. Do you think the dollar will fall further?

Throughout the world, prices of oil and gas have no relation to the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and other currencies, but instead depend on the fact that consumption continues to increase much greater than supply, which will eventually force humans to discover many different ways to reduce their consumption of oil and gas.

In light of current high equity valuations, you have suggested owning less in stocks. Would you put this in terms of a conventional pension fund? Would you suggest some alternatives to equities?

Because both share prices and bond prices are high this year, many wise pension managers invest in open-end mutual funds that try to maintain short positions in stocks about equal to their long positions.

In this way, a pension fund can benefit from a wise security analyst while waiting for the time when either stocks or bonds can be bought at bargain prices.

There is a school of thought (Arnott, Asness, Bernstein, etc.) that believes investors can no longer expect the historic 10 percent to 11 percent total return on equities. Do you agree?

It is normal for voters to elect politicians who promise to spend too much. This increases the rate of inflation, and so after adjusting for inflation, return on stocks over the next market cycle may average only 3 percent.

Junius Morgan once advised his son, J. Pierpont Morgan, that one could never go wrong being bullish about America. Given some of the current concerns, especially the idea that the West's historic advantages may be waning, do you agree with Junius today?

Throughout history, all major nations have eventually had a weaker competitive position; and therefore the Morgan family was shortsighted in thinking that nations of Asia cannot become stronger competitors than the U.S.A.

Do you believe, as historian Samuel Huntington has written, that the period when the West eclipsed manufacturing in China and India is over?

Nations of America and Europe in the latest two centuries have encouraged free competition and therefore, enjoyed increasing prosperity, but this advantage will be smaller now that China and Russia have understood the limitations caused by communism.

What is your view on the growth of hedge funds?

There will be a scandal because the cost burden is so great. In mutual funds it is unusual for a fund to be ahead more than 2 percent or 3 percent. The typical hedge fund is charging 2 percent to 3 percent, plus 5 percent to invest, and 20 percent to 25 percent of profits.

Questions about personal finance and investments may be sent to:

SCOTT BURNS,
P.O. Box 655237, Dallas 75265; e-mail can be sent to scott@scottburns.com.
Burns' Web page is scottburns.com.