Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (151537)	11/11/2004 4:51:58 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 281500

"These and the other points are irrelevant to the question because the UN is not sovereign over the world but I'll answer these two anyway. No resolution was need suspending the ceasefire. Its a ceasefire agreement. If the agreement is violated then there is no more requirement to cease fire. The UN approved of the serious consequences in resolution 1441. There is no inherent need for an additional resolution to actually impose the serious consequences. " This is very hard for them to understand. They think the UN does have sovereignty and they will buy the french position over that of the US every time. Remember how the US commmunists and leftists did the same with Uncle Joe Stalin. Some of those folks are in denial today as relates UN and France. mike