Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (211527)	11/12/2004 9:10:54 AM
From: Suma	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573462

It's easier to make negative charges that are unsubstantiated than to try to find the truth.. Both candidates were maligned and one fault that I find is that Kerry did not repudiate the charges against him. He rarely spoke about them.. to the best of my knowledge...

To: TimF who wrote (211527)	11/13/2004 3:55:05 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573462

The evidence points to a General Discharge. Kerry carried a Secret Clearance. The Navy would not permit that to continue after they learned of his treasonous activities. It has been claimed that all Naval officers have to have a Secret Clearance. The fastest way to fix it is to give him a General Discharge. General Discharge strips all rights for the person. Why did Kerry get his medals and ribbons restored in 1985 after joining the Senate? Occam's Razor states that one should not make more assumptions than the minimum needed. The above logic fits Occam's Razor. The apologist explanations rely on too many assumptions.