Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (660003)	11/12/2004 11:20:47 PM
From: Wayners	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Wait till the Brits start losing lots of guys...they have been in safety in the south.

To: E who wrote (660003)	11/13/2004 10:12:01 AM
From: J. C. Dithers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

As usual, you find interesting and worthwile articles to post. On the other hand, I think you likely draw the wrong conclusions. No one fights with more bravery in the trenches than the British soldier. However, the command level has always been too cautious and risk averse to loss of life. The reason is that British officers rise in the ranks on the basis of pedigree rather than performance (too many are "Sirs"). Wars are still won at the hand-to-hand, door-to-door combat level. Nothing has changed since Normandy, when total air control and weeks of bombing to soften up beach defenses made little difference--the landing could only be secured one-machine-gun-nest-at-a-time with heavy casualties. Neither could Germany be beaten with technology, but only with the blood of millions of American and Russian troops willing to die. The British fought bravely when they had to but were not a significant factor in the victory on the ground. War has not changed since, especially not in a house-to-house operation such as Fallujah. Civilians in the city knew what was coming and had the opportunity to leave. That British commanders would have had "concerns and fears" is all too predictable. That it why they were not invited to participate. That is why the "heavy-handed" Americans had to do the job, and take the casualties, as usual. I don't believe that the views of British commanders will be considered a must-read by the U.S. Marines.