Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RealMuLan who wrote (55929)	11/14/2004 1:09:05 AM
From: RealMuLan	Respond to of 74559

This time the Chinese submarine was seen showing up near Liuqiu Islands. And since China (neither Jiang JieShi or Taiwan) ever abandon the sovereignty of LiuQiu Islands, so it is ridiculous to claim China's sub “invaded” Japanese water. Here is a little history about LiuQiu (e.g. Ryukyu or Japanese call it Okinawa): LiuQiu Islands belonged to China before 1875. Japanese occupied them in 1875. In 1895, Japanese declared JiaWu War to China. China was defeated, and then Japan occupied Taiwan as a result. In 1896, Japanese occupied China's DiaoYu Islands (Japanese call it Senkaku). After Japanese were defeated in 1945, both Liu Qiu Islands and Diaoyu Islands were under the US control. In May, 1972, the US and Japan secretly signed an agreement (US-Japan San Francisco Agreement), “officially” transferred both islands to Japan without asking China's opinion. And in the agreement, the US cleverly avoided the issue of sovereignty of LiuQiu Islands, just transferred the administration right of LiuQiu Islands to Japan. Potsdam Declaration after WWII has clearly stated that the transferring of LiuQiu and DiaoYu Islands should be done under the common agreement of four countries (The US, Ex-Soviet Union, Britain, and China), so the secret agreement bet. the US and Japan can never hold on international arena.