Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dara who wrote (19922)	11/14/2004 1:31:08 PM
From: rubbersoul	Respond to of 313057

Dara, I listened to the interview as well. Looks like we have front row seats for the next ride (I hope). John

To: dara who wrote (19922)	11/14/2004 2:10:16 PM
From: Canuck Dave	Respond to of 313057

GLG is being more highly valued because it has more ounces coming on line soon. That's probably why G is getting some buzz all of a sudden. There's an expectation new management may acquire another company or in turn allow itself be bought out. Lots of "mystery" starting to surround the company. CD

To: dara who wrote (19922)	11/14/2004 3:22:15 PM
From: philv	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 313057

GLG: He didn't mention that they have mines coming on. For example, EL SAUZAL, from their recent news release: "Preliminary milling operations began at El Sauzal in October, with successful completion of the 100-per-cent load test of the grinding circuit. Expected to achieve commercial production this month, El Sauzal will become the company's largest and lowest cost source of gold production. Ore mining is continuing in both the East and West pits with good correlation between actual results and the reserve model. El Sauzal remains on track to produce 35,000 ounces of gold by year-end. The mine is expected to produce approximately 170,000 ounces of gold in 2005, its first full year of operation." It has other projects, eg. MARLIN in Guatamala which will be producing by year end 2005. So, I don't think bringing up the figure of $10,000/oz without at least some qualification and comparison was fair.