Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dara who wrote (19926)	11/14/2004 5:23:42 PM
From: rubbersoul	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 313059

< but if you are selective and you buy juniors that have merit or are producing or are near production or in a feasibility or near a feasibility, that is value investing now.> He must be an Ormetal subscriber! <g> Let's hope David Morgan is right. Cheers, John

To: dara who wrote (19926)	11/14/2004 6:28:31 PM
From: philv	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 313059

Those are indeed big numbers, but if you look at Goldcorp for example, Glamis has less than half the production (when the chart was assembled), but it has more reserves and much more production coming on line. When everything is taken into consideration, it kind of equalizes out. Both Glamis & Goldcorp are unhedged, profitable, and have no debt. Glamis is continually growing with several mines, while Goldcorp has not been able to get away from its one great mine. Looking at just one number can be extremely misleading imo, and that really was my comment. But I agree, these mines are highly valued.