Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dayuhan who wrote (86154)	11/14/2004 10:00:28 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793553

I wonder if the definition of "disloyal" will include those who failed to tell the administration what it wanted to hear. They are after the people who leaked with the intent of toppling Bush. It was so outrageous this last year that DC'rs couldn't believe it. I posted McCain's remarks on it here. Message 20766980 Their only hope to survive was to have Kerry elected.

To: Dayuhan who wrote (86154)	11/15/2004 1:29:34 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793553

I wonder if the definition of "disloyal" will include those who failed to tell the administration what it wanted to hear. An intelligence officer should ideally place loyalty to the truth above loyalty to the administration Steven, in the weeks before the election, the CIA gave its blessing to a not-very-anonymous Anonymous operative who made the rounds of TV and radio hyping a book with the title "Imperial Hubris", but which might as well have had the title "Bush is a Shit and So are All His Advisors". A most overt covert operation. I doubt any mere importunant truth-tellers have too much to worry about; there are bigger and obviouser heads that are gonna roll.