Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aladin who wrote (86298)	11/15/2004 2:36:24 PM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 793761

You choose the semantics. As I've stated, "replace" seems like an apt enough word to me. If Will has a synonym he likes better, that's fine with me. I was just befuddled over why Will would be so distressed about "replace." I just ran "replace" through the thesaurus. Maybe Will would like "substitute" or "reconstitute" better. Or maybe he wants to stick to "privatize." I can understand him wanting to get the effort off to a good start so he's want a word with the right spin. But given Bush's mandate, it shouldn't matter what word they use... <g> I was just curious about what might be bugging Will. Usually what he writes resonates with me. I just thought someone might be able to explain it to me.