To: zonder who wrote (15912 ) 11/16/2004 9:59:44 AM From: mishedlo Respond to of 116555 Dollar's Decline Is 2004's Defining Market Move: Mark Gilbert Nov. 16 (Bloomberg) -- It's time to dust off a remark John Connally made about the dollar when he was Richard Nixon's U.S. Treasury secretary. ``It's our currency, but it's your problem.'' Three decades later, the problem is back. The dollar's dive against the euro and the yen is turning out to be the defining market move of 2004. After years of ignoring U.S. deficits, the currency market is using the trade and current-account figures as a reason (excuse?) to whack the dollar to a record low against the euro and a seven-month low versus the yen. The biggest worry for European and Japanese officials isn't just the extent of the dollar's slide. It's the conspiracy theory doing the rounds that says the U.S. would like nothing more than to see a sustained slide in its currency. Yesterday, Treasury Secretary John Snow trotted out the standard party line that ``a strong dollar is in America's interest.'' Currency traders ignored him -- same as they ignored the surge in U.S. employment reported Nov. 5, when figures showed the economy created twice as many jobs as economists had forecast, and the Nov. 10 Commerce Department release showing the U.S. trade gap unexpectedly narrowed in September. Indeed, a couple of minutes after the last set of trade figures, traders drove the dollar to $1.30 against the euro for the first time ever. It's currently hovering at about $1.2970. Against the yen, the U.S. currency is at 105.31. Twin Deficits The most important part of Snow's comments wasn't the robotic incantation of ``strong dollar.'' It was his accompanying assertion that ``currency values are best set in open and competitive exchange markets.'' With the U.S. trade gap at a record $496.5 billion last year, and the current account deficit reaching $166.2 billion in the second quarter, currency forecasters reckon the market is setting a value for the dollar that will take it toward $1.40 per euro and through 105 yen. Are the conspiracy theorists correct? Is a unilateral policy of benign dollar neglect by the U.S. administration set to inflict shock and awe on the financial markets? A look at the motivations of the four most interested groups should help determine how willing the U.S. might be to let the dollar extend its slide. 1. The U.S. While the U.S. Treasury is responsible for currency policy, the central bank still has a lot of sway. In the past few months, Fed officials ranging from Chairman Alan Greenspan to Governor Susan Bies to St. Louis Fed President William Poole have lined up to disparage their government's spending habits, and warn that the twin deficits risk undermining the dollar and driving government borrowing costs higher. You might almost think the Fed was waving a sign in front of currency traders saying ``sell the dollar.'' You might be right. A weaker dollar helps the Fed out, giving it room to push its target rate for overnight borrowing higher without facing accusations of killing off the economic recovery. Four rate increases this year have driven the key rate to 2 percent, which the Fed says ``remains accommodative.'' The futures market tells us the central bank will take another step higher in December. We don't know what the Fed regards as a neutral level for interest rates; we do know that it's north of 2 percent, and dollar weakness helps ease the path to higher interest rates. ``Our work is not done,'' Fed Governor Mark Olson said in a speech in Toronto yesterday. Greenspan, coming up to his last year at the helm with retirement looming in January 2006, is likely to embrace the dollar's decline as a useful balm for a faltering 2005 economy. President George W. Bush's administration is likely to do the same, letting the weaker dollar reduce the trade deficit by boosting exports. 2. Europe ``Brutal'' was how ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet described the dollar's recent movement last week. ``Unwelcome,'' was Dutch Finance Minister Gerrit Zalm's verdict yesterday. ``Fatal'' might be more apt, given how European growth is leaning on the crutch of exports to make even minimal headway. After third- quarter growth for the 12 euro-using nations came in at 0.3 percent, the European Commission chopped its fourth-quarter forecast to 0.4 percent from 0.5 percent. With one-fifth of the economy coming from exports, that might start to look wildly optimistic should the euro break to record highs against the U.S. currency. When Brent crude-oil futures were trading above $50 a barrel, a strong euro looked like a godsend helping to cushion the European economy from surging energy costs. Now that oil is close to $40, the dollar's decline is a hindrance rather than a help. There's little Europe can do to halt the euro's rise, though. Italian Finance Minister Domenico Siniscalco's Nov. 10 claim that the Group of Seven industrialized countries might be poised for coordinated dollar buying drew a collective giggle from participants in the foreign-exchange market. Trichet, wisely, is sticking closely to a limited script, keeping what verbal ammunition he has in reserve. There are analysts who argue that it's easier for a central bank to halt a currency's rise than it is to prop up a declining currency. I'm not convinced. Without U.S. backing, the ECB would struggle to hold back the tide of dollar sales once $1.30 is breached. 3. Asia Japan's 0.3 percent third-quarter growth rate was hardly the stuff of a rebounding economy. The median forecast of 28 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News was for 2.1 percent growth. The word anemic springs to mind. You can argue whether Japan's efforts to prevent the yen from rising in recent years have succeeded, or whether the yen might have averaged about 113 yen in the past two years even without billions of dollars of currency market manipulation. Whichever is true, currency traders look poised to test Japan's resolve in preventing a spring to 100 yen per dollar. The wildcard is China. Merrill Lynch & Co.'s currency strategy team, led by Alex Patelis, is sticking to its forecast that China will revalue its currency by year-end, and start pegging it to a basket of currencies rather than maintaining the rate of 8.3 to the dollar that's prevailed since 1995. Suppose Merrill is right. Suppose China starts rebalancing its $500 billion or so of foreign exchange reserves. Maybe it doesn't need to hold as many dollar assets once the yuan is tied to a basket of currencies rather than just the dollar. Suddenly, there's an 800-pound gorilla in the market. Selling dollars. 4. Hedge Funds The $900 billion of funds that the hedge funds have to throw around makes them the most important players in any market you care to mention. It's been a tough year, with just 3.8 percent to show for their 2004 efforts, down from 15 percent last year, according to an index of returns compiled by Credit Suisse Group and Tremont Capital Management. Faced with the prospect of investors withdrawing their capital in January, there must be a strong temptation to try and boost returns by driving the dollar down even further by year-end. As the saying goes, ``the trend is your friend.''quote.bloomberg.com