To: Archie Meeties  who wrote (12 ) 11/16/2004 3:03:00 PM From: tuck  Read Replies (2)  | Respond to    Certainly, the clinical problem becomes greater after several years, so that's a good question.  Annoyingly, there doesn't seem to have been any long term follow-up with the human patients in the Prevent I & II trials.  If there had been, we'd have a little genuine data.  So we have to make do with rats and rabbits.  Sigh.  That would be the second question for management, the first being "how good is angiography for making fine distinctions in luminal diameter?"  Raised by rkrw (perhaps you saw my post on the issue on the Valuation thread).pnas.org pnas.org