Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (18618)	11/16/2004 4:43:05 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

It appears neither of our ships are at harbor... least not the same one. I did not see a reference to this king sitting in a garden in the here after. So, I took it to mean his temporal rewards of Kinship. That is how I interpreted it and with no correlation to the Quranic verses. Your comment seems to be related a Quranic reference to the here after. In this case I would note a couple of things. The Quranic references are not meant to be interpreted as literal events and circumstances, only as an indication of how far beyond earthly rewards, the rewards of heaven would be. In the case of being with virgins in heaven, there is no reference to anyone being abused or ravaged or whatever anyway. In fact, the Quranic reference says that virginty would be instantaineously restored so that the experience would never be lessened. And again not literal events in any case. I realize you have a problem with anything that involves imagination beyond your temporal experience, so I doubt I will have any interest in continuing this...