Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (211950)	11/17/2004 5:05:40 PM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578288

John, I'm still waiting for a thank you... especially from the people with two or more kids. I'm more than happy to contribute $1000's every year for your kids... just like to hear a "thanks". On behalf of all Americans - thanks for chipping in to help educate America's next generation.

To: Road Walker who wrote (211950)	11/17/2004 10:57:05 PM
From: brian1501	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578288

Sure it would, or create a deficit. You fiscally liberal Republicans think you can give tax breaks with impunity... eventually somebody pays. So you think giving a home-school family a deduction for their books and materials would cost more than that kid actually sitting in the school system? Doubtful. You fiscally liberal Republicans think you can give tax breaks with impunity... eventually somebody pays. I'd still like to hear how it would cost less to have a kid in the school system than it would be to give a deduction for that kid's books at home. Keep in mind, that kid's parents have paid their share into the school system as well. For the cost of his books (in my proposal), you've taken one kid out of the system. How would that raise your taxes again? Brian