Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tralfasador who wrote (88053)	11/17/2004 6:47:27 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 122088

This is legal malpractice, the attorney just made the case of the prosecution. That by claiming to be helping the FBI that in fact Mr. Elgindy was able to use his ability to unearth non-public information from the FBI and SEC. This is the same way Hackers are able to get codes from employees, in order to break into the systems. Likely be the same contacts that Royer gave Mr. Elgindy. Nonsense. Neither the FBI nor the SEC ever tells anyone anything specific. Sometimes, however, it's possible to guess from the questions they ask if they're investigating. Your guess might be right, or it might be wrong. You seem to think Tony was the only person around who reported potential scams to the Feds. Not at all; I'm sure they get hundreds of emails every day. They follow up on a very small percentage of those. I've never traded on the basis of anything I've "deduced" from conversations with the Feds, but they don't tell you not to, nor do they request that you don't discuss the infomation you've given them.