SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: NOW who wrote (16139)11/17/2004 9:38:45 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Do Or Die?
[a gold and silver analysis based on COT reports - quite interesting really - mish]

By Theodore Butler

A close reading of the current Commitments of Traders Report (COT), including an extrapolation since the Tuesday cut-off, indicates we are still at a bearish extreme in gold and silver. Yes, there was technical fund liquidation and dealer short covering in the latest report, but that activity clearly took place on the big down day on November 2. Subsequently, it appears the tech funds came rushing back onto the long side (with the dealers going short) at higher prices. The tech funds are still buying high and selling low, the dealers are doing the opposite.

Basically, there are only two ways for this big tech fund long/dealer short position to play out. One party will have to be the aggressor. Either the tech funds liquidate at lower prices, or the dealers cover at higher prices. No one knows which it will be. We do know that, in gold and silver, the dealers have never panicked and covered shorts at higher prices. Certainly, there is little or no visible evidence that the dealers are about to panic here. But, they could, particularly in silver, and my sense is we would get little advanced warning.

The reason I analyze the COTs is to identify low or high-risk points in the market. I hope I have been clear that this type of analysis is short term in nature, and to a long-term silver investor the COTs matter little. And long term is the right way to go. Still, trying to divine the basic rhythms of the markets is a compelling intellectual attraction. Because I’ve seen the COTs play out in a certain repetitive way for many years (with variations, of course), it’s hard for me to ignore them.

Over the past year, there have been several ultra-low and ultra-high risk points in silver and gold as defined by the COTs. The most recent low-risk point was back in mid-September (The Set-Up?). Since that point, silver has rallied over 20% in price ($1.25+ per oz). But it has been tech fund net buying of almost 35,000 COMEX futures contracts, or 175 million ounces, that caused the rally. In gold, almost 80,000 net contracts were bought by the funds since the September lows. It is the addition of these contracts that caused the price to rise and greatly increase the risk of a tech fund flush out to the downside.

This doesn’t mean, of course, that the funds will get flushed out. As I said, no one knows how it will play out. But we are at an extreme juncture. It doesn’t hurt, even for a long-term silver investor to recognize that, at least for mental preparation in volatile markets. It’s always dollars to the upside in silver, but not always a couple of dimes to the downside. Can silver explode in price from here? Of course. Can silver get smacked down with tech fund liquidation? Also, of course.

The current situation is more extreme than usual, in my opinion. It’s almost as if the dealers are in a "do or die" situation. We have a confluence of forces that are superimposed upon the extreme COT position. For one, we have a very heavy COMEX option expiration in gold and silver on November 23. This is the one month of the year when gold and silver have a concurrent option expiration. Normally the major option months are staggered. The amount of call options that is and could get "into-the-money" at current or higher gold and silver prices are massive. I don’t recall an option expiration cycle with such heavy numbers of call options in both gold and silver threatening to go live if prices remain steady or move moderately higher. If this were to occur, tremendous additional pressure could be placed upon the dealers.

Likewise, December is the largest futures delivery month of the year, and also the only concurrent major futures month shared by gold and silver. The delivery process begins on November 30, one-week after the options settlement. Considering the current one-year lows in the level of COMEX silver inventories, it is not hard to imagine a "tight" December delivery process. That tightness would only be exacerbated if the short position going into the first delivery day were swollen with a full tech fund long position and unusual in the money option exercises. Additionally, the recent purchase of 5 million ounces by the Central Fund of Canada (not 6 million, as I reported originally) creates a tighter overall physical market than otherwise would be the case.

In short, the stakes are much higher for the dealers than is usually the case at extreme COT points. Especially considering that the leader of the silver wolf pack, AIG, has apparently departed. If the dealers were to ever get overrun, these unusual additional factors would seem to add to that likelihood. Amazingly, the total gross short position in COMEX silver (futures + call options as of 11/8) is the highest in recent memory, at 198,000 contracts. That’s the equivalent of 990 million ounces. This is a billion ounce paper short position that is much larger than the 600 million oz in world production and maybe 150 million oz in known bullion inventories, combined. Try to find another commodity with that configuration. You won’t. Because the stakes are unusually high for the dealers, they will be working overtime to engineer a sharp sell-off. If such a sell-off does materialize, it should set-up a tremendous low risk buying opportunity.

If I knew which way this bloated COT position was going to be resolved, I would tell you. The simple truth is that no one can know. All we can do is observe and prepare. So, instead of worrying about how the market may behave short term, prepare, emotionally and financially, for any outcome. And concentrate on what we do know, namely, in a commodity deficit prices must eventually rise to eliminate that deficit.

Fortunately, there is one simple and best solution that overrules all short-term uncertainty and allows us to capture the certainty of the long term. That simple and best solution is unencumbered physical silver. There are no contingencies or "what-ifs" with real silver. There are no worries about what could go wrong. No concerns over short-term price fluctuations. When the law of supply and demand triumphs in silver, there will be no unexpected surprises for those holding real silver.

In has been my observation, almost universal among those that own real silver, that they tend to disregard the impact of short-term price movements upon their real silver holdings. This is the way it should be. In fact, it’s kind of funny. I talk to people with big physical silver holdings that are very concerned with short-term price movements, but only for the possible impact on short-term speculative holdings. Their physical silver holdings are thought of very differently. It’s as if we are talking about two different commodities. We are. One is paper and one is real. One is uncertain in the short term, the other is certain for the long term. I hope and wish for everyone to look at silver this way.

investmentrarities.com



To: NOW who wrote (16139)11/17/2004 9:44:13 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
From Mike Hartman - FinancialSense....

Dollar Falls to Record Low as Snow Signals No Agreement to Stem Its Slide

The dollar fell to a record against the euro for the fourth time in two weeks and dropped versus the yen as U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow signaled he won't back any agreement to stem the currency's slide.

"The history of efforts to impose non-market valuations on currencies is at best unrewarding and checkered," Snow said in response to a question on whether he would support an agreement with Europeans to manage the pace of the dollar's decline. He made the comments after a speech in London. (MY COMMENT: Why doesn’t Mr. Snow tell Japan and China about the "unrewarding and checkered" history of currency intervention, instead of telling Europe why we aren’t going to support the dollar in the currency markets?)

Against the euro, the dollar extended its decline this year to 3.4 percent, falling to $1.3037 at 1:44 p.m. in New York from $1.2956 yesterday, according to electronic foreign-exchange dealing system EBS. It dropped as low as $1.3048, the weakest since the euro's 1999 debut. The U.S. currency fell to 103.81 yen, from 105.35, trading at its weakest since April 2.

"It's become obvious the U.S. administration isn't going to stand in the way of dollar weakness," said Jeremy Fand, senior proprietary trader in New York at WestLB AG. "The U.S. administration is playing hardball with the Europeans. If the Europeans aren't going to stimulate their economy, they have to understand there's a consequence."

A rising currency may damp economic growth by making European exports more expensive. Sales abroad account for a fifth of the euro region's economy, which grew at a quarterly rate of 0.3 percent in the third quarter, the slowest pace in more than a year. For the U.S., a weaker dollar may help narrow the record current-account deficit.

'Not Welcome'

Fand predicted the dollar will fall to $1.35 per euro in the next few months. He said the European Central Bank wouldn't "hit the panic button" and consider selling the euro to weaken it until it reaches about $1.40.

"We don't welcome" the euro's rise to a record, European Union Monetary Affairs Commissioner Joaquin Almunia said in Strasbourg, France. "We are all interested in avoiding disorderly movements of the currencies." At least six European Central Bank officials, including President Jean-Claude Trichet, in the past 10 days expressed concern over euro strength.

Basically, Mr. Snow is trying to tell the European Union to get with the program and stimulate the economy via monetary and fiscal stimulus. We want them to inflate just like we are along with Japan. Monetarily we are telling them to lower interest rates and gun the money supply, while on the fiscal side we are probably telling them to increase government deficit spending to keep the money flowing until economic momentum can sustain itself. Remember that the euro was created to eventually work as a global reserve currency concurrent with the U.S. dollar. It looks like our guys are saying, OK Europe, you want a strong currency…you can have it along with its attendant problems. Now we have to see who will win this grand game of chicken. Will the U.S. begin to impose discipline on monetary and fiscal policies, or will the E.C.B. buckle under the pressure of a strong euro forcing them to overtly weaken the euro and support the dollar just as Japan and China have been doing?

Something else from Mr. Snow appeared in another Bloomberg article that came across as almost comical. I ask you, who is this guy is trying to con? He was asked about the possibility that the Bush administration doesn’t mind the dollar’s drop because it makes U.S. exports more competitive. His answer, “Let me be clear: our policy is for a strong dollar. Our dollar policy remains unchanged because a strong dollar is in both the national and international interest.” If you have seen a dollar chart for the last three years, it’s obvious this is just the stated party line with nothing of substance. The dollar is getting crushed internationally!

It appears quite clear that we are headed for some turbulent times in the currency markets with all the noise between the European and U.S. officials, the direct link between the dollar and the Chinese yuan (Renmibi), and overt intervention by Japan to weaken the yen. Who really knows what any of the major countries intend to do with their currencies. One thing for sure is that the countries around the globe will not decrease their money supplies to strengthen their currencies, but will only change the rate at which they increase the supply of money. Once again, that is why I believe the right thing to do is to invest in the only time-tested, proven currency of precious metals. Deflation is not an option if we are to keep any semblance of the global monetary system we use today. The Federal Reserve knows their job is very simply to inflate or die. We are now pressuring Europe to do the same. In some ways it looks like we are doing all we can to alienate our former allies. As time passes it is becoming more and more obvious why the Europeans have been snuggling up to Russia, China, and Iran for future business expansion and energy needs.

I also heard a blurb on CNBC from one of their commentators that someone from the ECB made comments about having to punish the “dollar managers” for their irresponsible deficit spending with a new round of import tariffs. The commentator mentioned possible tariffs on textiles, sweet corn and machinery. I have been looking for supporting evidence on the internet, but have not been able to confirm the possible threat of import tariffs. If this is true, you can add trade wars to currency wars for next year.

Gold and silver are still marching forward, but there are clearly some doubting gold and silver stock investors that remain on the sidelines waiting for a pull-back. Sure we could get one, but what if we don’t? It was sure nice to see some of the juniors finally breaking out today…one of my favorites was up by 9% today. At what point do you begin to chase this bull market? Many investors in gold and silver mining companies watch the metals prices closely, and even go a step deeper to see the positions of traders on the commodity exchanges. The open interest in gold and silver is reaching new heights and the short position of the commercials continues to grow along with the net long positions held by the specs. Many analysts and investors are expecting the commercials to get heavy handed with their selling to force the market lower, especially with the stakes being very high for the December contracts. My take on the situation is pretty simple. As long as the dollar is getting hammered in the currency markets, the commercials won’t be able to roll the specs over.

If you are interested in reading more on the shenanigans of the ongoing saga between the specs and commercials, I’m leaving you with these two links to a couple authors that really do know the COT report and how to decipher the messages. The first came a week ago from Ted Butler called “Do or Die?” and the second comes from my friend Dan Norcini (AKA, Trader Dan) called, “Some Comments on the Latest COT Release of 11-15-2004.” (Try the trial membership to lemetrolpolecafe.com to view the article.) I have a great deal of respect for both of these gentlemen to give you the straight scoop. As a special point of interest, please note what Mr. Butler has to say about investors holding bullion versus paper silver and mining stocks. If you own any bullion you will know exactly what he means. If you don’t own any, I think it’s a great idea to go get ya’ some!! Once you have it in your possession you will most likely begin to feel a greater sense of financial security…I did and still do!

Have a Great Evening!

Mike Hartman

More here:
financialsense.com



To: NOW who wrote (16139)11/17/2004 10:21:33 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (7) | Respond to of 116555
 
My Latest Cover - OT
lakesuperior.com
lakesuperior.com

Most people would never know that places like that exist right here in the midwest. That is from a bluff overlooking Lake Superior in Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore in the Michigan UP.

This is actually the second time that exact image was used on a cover.
I think the other time was for the Michigan AAA magazine.
Michigan Living.

I have had about 4-5 covers for Michigan Living but not any for years. I have also had about 4-6 covers perhaps for Lake Superior, but this is the first one for quite some time.



To: NOW who wrote (16139)11/17/2004 10:26:03 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Fears over 'shake-out' prompt Pimco move
By Jenny Wiggins in New York
Published: November 17 2004 19:35 | Last updated: November 17 2004 19:35

Pimco, the world's largest bond fund, is swapping into higher-quality corporate debt amid concern that a "shake-out" may be on the verge of puncturing a bond market bubble.

"We're upgrading quality within our corporate bond portfolio," said Mark Kiesel, head of Pimco's investment grade corporate desk. "This is a bubble . . . and there's going to be a shakeout." The fund has been replacing low investment grade BBB-rated debt securities with more highly rated A or AA-rated securities over the past month.

US corporate bond yield spreads are trading at their tightest levels for six years. Although the tight spreads can be partially attributed to improved creditworthiness as companies have paid down debt and strengthened their balance sheets, fund managers are worried that technical factors have created an overvalued market.

Demand for corporate bonds this year has been stronger than supply as investors, faced with a lacklustre stock market and low interest rates on money market investments, have chased high-yielding securities. A booming structured finance market has bolstered demand for corporate bonds, with 2004 likely to be a record year for issuance of collateralised debt obligations (CDOs), according to Nomura Securities.

Meanwhile, foreign investors continue to be heavy buyers of US corporate debt. Net purchases of corporate bonds by foreign investors rose to a record $44.6bn in September, despite the weakening US dollar.

Pimco, however, argues that the market is out of kilter.

"The valuations don't justify these [yield] levels," Mr Kiesel said, pointing out that the fund was able to recently swap a BBB-rated supermarket company for a split A/ AA-rated brokerage trading at the same yield.

The fund has a somewhat bearish outlook on the US economy, predicting that GDP growth will slow to 2-3 per cent next year from about 4 per cent this year, and consumer spending will weaken as the effect of tax cuts wears off.

Many companies are struggling with a drop in so-called "pricing power", and are finding it difficult to pass higher energy and healthcare costs on to consumers.

Pimco believes higher-leveraged companies with low credit ratings are a risk in an environment of slower growth, because they have less of a cushion to withstand a hit to their profit margins. It is particularly wary of companies in cyclical industries, which are highly sensitive to changes in the business cycle.

These include airlines and auto companies, which will suffer from higher fuel costs, as well as retailers and technology companies - which are vulnerable to declines in capital spending.

news.ft.com



To: NOW who wrote (16139)11/17/2004 10:37:19 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Bullish Economic Data Raise the Probability of A December Hike

northerntrust.com



To: NOW who wrote (16139)11/17/2004 10:39:37 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
The Persistent Gain in Core Wholesale Prices Should Be Worrisome For the Fed

I think I missed yesterday's report
here it is

northerntrust.com