Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dayuhan who wrote (86834)	11/17/2004 9:51:22 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793550

You warn the administration that the DOD intel people, directed by amateurs, are feeding them questionable information from self-interested sources. They ignore you, and listen to the people who tell them what they want to hear Nice try, Steve, and the CIA thanks you. Now show me the CIA analysts who said BEFOREHAND that there was little evidence of Saddam's WMD. For that matter, show the British, French or German intelligence analysts who said so - before March 2003. There were arguments about the state of Saddams nuclear program. There were none about his having WMDs. Naturally, the CIA prefers not to stress that angle these days -g- Political activity by CIA personnel is unacceptable, and anyone who stepped over that line is going to have to go. So you're okay with the top echelon leaving? Because the Imperial Hubris campaign certainly had the blessing of the CIA bigs. Nobody could mistake what was going on there.