SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sun Tzu who wrote (151943)11/18/2004 3:28:42 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 281500
 
You know, I looked at the definition- and one definition has the word CLEAR in it- in that the authorization of the vote needs to be clear- I would argue that 2.9% difference isn't very clear, and when half the people are agin' you, I wouldn't say that is a mandate.

On the other hand we have this:

3: the commission that is given to a government and its policies through an electoral victory

Which would lead you to think that any victory, no matter how shrimpy, could be considered a mandate (as is the case in this election, if one believes the vote count)

So, I'd say it's more ambiguous than I would have thought, based on my recollection of the definition.



To: Sun Tzu who wrote (151943)11/18/2004 3:30:06 PM
From: Bill  Respond to of 281500
 
57% of the people voted against Clinton in 1992.
51% voted against him in 1996.

A president needs over 50% to have a mandate.
Bush with his 51.4% HAS a mandate.