SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Watkins who wrote (152081)11/19/2004 2:52:29 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Then it wouldnt be a deterrent and i wouldnt be for it. I suspect you may be wrong though and since neither of us is all that knowledgable on how a devout muslim, wahabi fanatic would react to such a deterrent threat, i would ask others with more knowledge to respond. And to compare bush to bin laden is sickening. You are testing the limits of my patience. There is no need to make stupid exaggerations to entertain winn and co.



To: Michael Watkins who wrote (152081)11/19/2004 3:17:51 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
LOL!!

Bush = Osama.....silly indeed.



To: Michael Watkins who wrote (152081)11/19/2004 4:02:57 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
No one will go to war unless he thinks his cause is just, except a sociopath. That is true whether it is Washington (a Deist), Lincoln (an agnostic), or Bush. And anyone who has any kind of belief in God presumes that God wills what is just, and therefore that God is in favor of his cause. Thus, you are drawing parallels that are not telling, because close to universal.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News