Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (88902)	11/20/2004 4:35:07 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

Bush is a criminal, there's no doubt of that. But the whole government is tainted at this point and since Ashcroft is the one who should be prosecuting where does that leave us!! Up the creek without a paddle. Check out the info on this thread without making snap judgements. The fact is those towers could not have collapsed from the jet strikes and fires. The physics proves that. Subject 53722

To: carranza2 who wrote (88902)	11/20/2004 4:54:25 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

The towers falling was a mind boggling structural failure but where is the "official" outcry asking why when these building were built to withstand it and the fires. Worse fires have not brought down other sky scrapers. Where is the outcry from those in control. Bush? Ashcroft? Where are the legions of investigators? They were never called. Thousands dead and Bush had to be pushed into allowing an investigation!! And then the investigators were limited as to what they could see. Government workers hand picked the pieces of girders they were allowed to analyze. If they could have seen them all they would have seen the evidence of cutting charges all the way down the towers. Coverup is the word. I firmly believe it was staged and the towers were brought down with controlled demolition. Bush has got to be the stupidest man who was ever President or the most evil. I choose both.

To: carranza2 who wrote (88902)	11/21/2004 11:57:58 PM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 108807

No, I don't think Bush was behind 911. I don't think he is capable of such great evil. I do believe that his administration deliberately created a culture of maximum fear for Americans, because they knew it would be difficult for a lot of people to vote for anyone else for president if we were at war. I think this was a very conscious ploy on their part. The American public is so stupid that they bought the lie that Saddam was involved with Al Qaeda, for example. I wouldn't put conjuring stuff up beyond Cheney. At his core Bush seems sincerely driven by his religious beliefs, even though he is a ruthless campaigner. What the Bush administration does extremely well is suppress, control and spin the news. So now instead of the truth on American tv--that we are guilty of horrible atrocities in Iraq--what we are seeing is the "terror slaughter houses" as if this justifies us killing maybe 100,000 innocent Iraqis. There were no terror slaughter houses before we invaded and bombed their country to smithereens.