Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Dave who wrote (88185)	11/21/2004 2:04:49 PM
From: Graystone	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

From the TOU or Section 2.3 The TOU doesn't seem to have a prohibition that would restrict the right of an account to have multiple wetware inputs. It is in fact structured so that it appears that an account can have more than ten fingers. The TOU reads If you believe someone has used your password or account without your authorization, by implication it appears that someone can use your account with your authorization. Almost every regular reader of SI knows who has the right to ban posters from this thread. Thanks to Hoatzin we now know that the problem lies with the way that Steinbrenner is linked into the conspiracy. It should be very obvious that the "Church"is not only culpable but the congregation is in fact, a "coven disguised as a choir". So Dave, if you are not really Dorby, who is the fat lady ? eh

To: SI Dave who wrote (88185)	11/22/2004 10:50:32 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

why don`t you remove all the bans? tony ain`t coming back to moderate and maybe some of the people tony banned would like to say something. thank you

To: SI Dave who wrote (88185)	11/22/2004 3:21:01 PM
From: ravenseye	Respond to of 122087

SI Dave, I agree with zeus628 about removing bans! It looks like 'scottonstocks' was banned during tonys absence too. See 6 recent posts about it from scottonstocks at "Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread." Subject 34644