Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Watkins who wrote (152206)	11/21/2004 1:44:55 PM
From: teevee	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

The bottom line is the Bush doctrine of making unilateral pre-emptive strikes against real and perceived threats. I happen to agree with Bush that it make sense to kill the terrorists before they kill more Americans and Israelis. Terrorsists cannot be reasoned with. How many innocent civilians from any country must die before you believe it is okay to respond? Will the responce be easier if we wait until Iran has nuclear weapons? President Bush has already stated that Iran will not have nuclear weapons-period. Time is running out. Iran is a rogue nation whose leadership are terrorists. The nuclear power plant, all other clandestine nuclear facilities and long range missile batteries must be destroyed before a nuclear WMD is in hand.