Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (89195)	11/22/2004 8:32:14 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

One would know she has a different morality from yours, not that she has none. It's quite clear from her post that killing animals figures quite prominantly in her morality. You seem to think that a morality which does not comport with your own is an absence of morality. This is clearly not the case. Of course it all depends on how you define morality. If you define morality as only that morality which you, yourself, recognize as morality- then I suppose your statement might be true. What is considered right, or virtuous, will be subject to dispute. In fact, I think there are some folks in the Middle East right this very moment who have a different morality than our own, who are causing us one heck of a problem. Of course they think WE are the immoral ones. They would probably ask YOU if you claim to be a moral person- no doubt they would be sure you could not be, judging by your posts. It's interesting how relative, and self referential most ideas in the world are. Not all ideas, but most.