Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (212235)	11/23/2004 12:44:40 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574265

Insulting? Then why does the right do it repeatedly? I thought it was SOP. Loyalty and rally around the flag....rah, rah, rah! Just as you are not interested in what labels are attached to the left, I am uninterested in what the left perceives is SOP for the right. Have I accused you of being similar to an alleged murderer and his family? This is you and I, mano a mano. The Democrats are the party of failed morals. Because Clinton got a BJ in his office......ridiculous! It was not because our President was soliciting and receiving adulterous sex. The Presidency is not a college GPA where he gets a C of foreign policy, a B for economic policy, an A for communication and an F for morals. Let’s see that would be a 2.0. Morals are pass-fail, and the Democrat party failed. You may not like the standard, but as long as you do not understand it, you will never understand why the Democrat Party is in decline. BTW how's this for GOP morals? So you have a list of a few people whose behavior you do not like. However, you do like Clinton's. You are exhibiting double standards; either it is relevant or it is not. You still missed the point, the President lied under oath. That is criminal behavior. It is a priori grounds for removal from office. And what is Zell Miller? Mr. Wonderful? You are so knee deep in your partisan bias, you can't see the forest for the trees. Zell miller was the opposite of John McCain, a DINO. In his state Republicans rule and you can choose to be Democrat and vote Republican or be Republican and vote I am not proud of this Congress, this president and this election. The country is way off course and I suspect in decline. Partisan complaints. Your suspicion that this country is in decline is correct, though I suspect you are unlikely to understand the root cause. (Clue - Demographics.) Intellectually, Kerry, Gore and Clinton could run circles around Mr. Bush........that's what I care about most. I want some intellect in the WH, not machismo. Why did Brokaw ask Kerry why President Bush's intelligence tests in the military showed him to be more intelligent than Kerry? Either you are too partisan to see the truth or you are too foolish to question the authority of the partisan liberal FMSM. President Bush does not concern himself with whether Dan Rather and the FMSM report his intelligence correctly. It is actually beneficial to be underestimated. The only fooling of the public has been done by the GOP. When the general public wakes up to that fact, including you, it may be too late. Ted, you are smarter than that. You respect my ability to communicate but you denigrate my message. Frankly, there is something wrong in that analysis. You might want to think about it. Ted, if you are offended by having me point out that the statement is not up to your usual high standards, then you will have to live with it. I am not going to apologize for seeing through the partisanship of the message. The Democrats are guilty of attempting to fool the public every day. The Partisan Liberal FMSM alternate between willing accomplice and leading the way. As for Bush, I've given him a chance.......of course, I had no choice. And things have not gone well, and with the exception of Afghanistan, he has done little of value in his first four years. I shudder to think what he will do in the next four. Even John Kerry could not screw up the country beyond recognition in four or eight years. Neither will President Bush. I wish I had a fiver for every guy who told me they didn't want to vote for Bush but did so because they didn't like Kerry. I think they may regret their decision. If I had a dollar for every person who disliked Kerry but voted for him anyway, my net worth would increase by over $30,000,000 instantly. IMO we are fortunate that we do not have to discover what a Kerry Presidency would be like. If Republicans went after him under aticle two fo the Constitution, Democrats would shout partisanship. The FMSM would be along for the ride. Ted, thanks for putting up with me.