Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (152483)	11/23/2004 5:54:35 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I am sorry to leave as you come on, but I have to see the family. Take it easy.......

To: Ish who wrote (152483)	11/23/2004 5:57:58 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

This is more like, if you steal a car, and drive it to the worst area of the inner city, and leave it there, and it gets vandalized are you or the keyer to blame. Answer? both of you. Iraq was not the US's "car". It was a sovereign nation.

To: Ish who wrote (152483)	11/25/2004 11:50:49 AM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<If you park your car and it gets keyed, are you or the keyer to blame. You parked it.> We did not park our car Ish, we invaded a sovereign nation that had not attacked us and we destroyed their government, destroyed their civil order and failed to stop the collapse of the country into anarchy -- we turned the country over to criminals the day we invaded. You say we had good intentions -- most of the world doubts that. But even if you accept that we had good intentions, we destroyed Iraq and turned it over to the criminals -- and yes, we are 100% to blame for that.