Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (87989)	11/23/2004 7:04:10 PM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 793552

"Anyway, here's Vang's first-hand account" Sorry, but I don't give much weight to a version of events from someone who slaughtered 6 & wounded 2. The man chased them down & some were shot in the back. He obviously was on private property - no tree stands are allowed on public land. This guy was an avid hunter who has had problems in the past relating to hunting. He has had domestic abuse problems & threatened to shoot his wife (all from news accounts). Yes there "may" have been one gun among the 8 others at some point. I find it highly unlikely that the initial group (that may have been unarmed) dared to hurl racial slurs to someone from a group of people that have known problems with recognizing property rights, ET AL, who was obviously trespassing & had a loaded semi-automatic rifle. Something just doesn't add up with the shooters story. Nothing excuses what he did. NOTHING! I will note that the media is all over the murderer's version of events. I hope they don't make him a victim due to their blind liberal bias.