SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (88087)11/24/2004 1:36:21 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793550
 
Thanksgiving: The Producer's Holiday
Thursday November 18, 2004
By: Gary Hull

This holiday is designed to celebrate, not faith and charity, but thought and production.

Thanksgiving celebrates man's ability to produce. The cornucopia filled with exotic flowers and delicious fruits, the savory turkey with aromatic trimmings, the mouth-watering pies, the colorful decorations--it's all a testament to the creation of wealth.

Thanksgiving is a uniquely American holiday, because this country was the first to create and to value material abundance. It is America that has been the beacon for anyone wanting to escape from poverty and misery. It is America that generated the unprecedented flood of goods that washed away centuries of privation. It is America, by establishing the precondition of production--political freedom--that was able to unleash the dynamic, productive energy of its citizens.

This should be a source of pride to every self-supporting individual. It is what Thanksgiving is designed to commemorate. But there are those, motivated by hatred for human comfort and happiness, who want to make Thanksgiving into a day of national guilt. We should be ashamed, they say, for consuming a disproportionate share of the world's food supply. Our affluence, they say, constitutes a depletion of the "planet's resources." The building of dams, the use of fossil fuels, the driving of sports utility vehicles--they insist--are cause, not for celebration, but for atonement. What if, they all wail, the rest of the world consumed the way Americans do?

If only that were to happen--we would have an Atlantis. For it would mean that the production of wealth would have multiplied. Man can consume only what he first produces. All production is an act of creation. It is the creation of wealth where nothing before existed--nothing useful to man. America transformed a once-desolate wilderness into farms, supermarkets and air-conditioned houses, not by taking those goods away from some have-nots, nor by "consuming" the "world's resources"--but by reshaping valueless elements of nature into a form beneficial to human beings.

Since human survival is not automatic, man's life depends on successful production. From food and clothing to science and art, every act of production requires thought. And the greater the creation, the greater is the required thinking.

This virtue of productiveness is what Thanksgiving is supposed to recognize. Sadly, this is a virtue rejected not only by the attackers of this holiday, but by its alleged defenders as well.

Many Americans make Thanksgiving into a religious festival. They agree with Lincoln, who, upon declaring Thanksgiving a national holiday in 1863, said that "we have been the recipients of the choicest bounties of heaven." They ascribe our material abundance to God's efforts, not man's.

That view is a slap in the face of any person who has worked an honest day in his life. The appropriate values for this holiday are not faith and charity, but thought and production. The proper thanks for one's wealth goes not to some mystical deity but to oneself, if one has earned that wealth.

The liberal tells us that the food on our Thanksgiving plate is the result of mindless, meaningless labor. The conservative tells us that it is the result of supernatural grace. Neither believes that it represents an individual's achievement.

But wealth is not generated by sheer muscle; India, for example, has far more manual laborers than does the United States. Nor is it generated by praying for God's blessing; Iran, for example, is far more religious. If the liberal and conservative views of wealth are correct, why aren't those countries awash in riches?

Wealth is the result of individual thought and effort. And each individual is morally entitled to keep, and enjoy, the consequences of such thought and effort. He should not feel guilty for his own success, or for the failures of others.

There is a spiritual need fed by the elaborate meal, fine china and crystal, and the presence of cherished guests. It is the self-esteem that a productive person feels at the realization that his thinking and energy have made consumption possible.

Come Thanksgiving Day, when some success-hating commentator condemns America for being the world's leading consumer, tell him that he is evading the underlying fact: that this country is the world's leading producer. And then, as you sit down to dinner, celebrate the spiritual significance of the holiday by raising a toast to the virtue of your own productive ability and to America's productive giants, past and present.

Dr. Hull is co-editor of The Ayn Reader and is a senior writer for the Ayn Rand Institute in Irvine, Calif. The Institute promotes the philosophy of Ayn Rand, author of Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead.



To: LindyBill who wrote (88087)11/24/2004 1:54:12 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Respond to of 793550
 
<Until we face this fact head on and institute educational change at the elementary and high school levels, we are engaged in a harmful charade.>

This idea is crazy, though it is a charade that is going on.

It is absurd to consider melanin content in relation to education. It has absolutely zero to do with brain function.

Melanin is purely a genetic sun-protection factor.

There is a correlation between melanin-content and brain power, but that's coincidence, not causation. It's to do with eons-long separation of Africans and Europeans, talking about the African Americans compared with European Americans.

As you can see from Condoleezza Rice, Thomas Sowell and Colin Powell and his son, having an excellent melanin content does not preclude high-performance brain function.

Just as Europeans range from pig-ignorant morons to superlative mega-brains, so do people who have melanin-rich skins. There's no reason to think that the distribution of brainpower among the melanin-rich should be the same as that for the melanin-deficient. They are entirely separate matters, and so it turns out to be when brainpower is measured.

In education, melanin should be completely ignored. What matters is individual development and ability. Trying to get a melanin-deficient moron into Yale is a waste of time, just as it's a waste of time to do so for a melanin-rich one.

The fact that there are a lot more melanin-rich who can't make the grade is not a function of their melanin content. Nor is it a matter of their elementary education or high school education. I'd look first at foetal diet [what the mother eats] and then the child's diet as an area to be improved. Then at home life. Elementary education and high school education would not have much effect. The melanin-deficient would also benefit from the same dietary and home life improvements.

Here's the data explaining what's going on. lagriffedulion.f2s.com Scroll down for the IQs of each country. Then, read The Bell Curve, without foaming at the mouth and ignoring facts. James Flynn of The Flynn Effect has also studied the business, with the intention of showing that we are all the same, however the groups of various genetics are bundled, but he didn't succeed and instead ended up with the data he got. pespmc1.vub.ac.be

Mqurice