Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (212305)	11/27/2004 7:11:56 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577892

re: Issue after issue shows that you are just unable to think clearly. I think clearly enough. The incremental cost of one child out of the system is almost nothing. As a good citizen, I am paying a very substantial tax, thousands each year, to educate his dumb kid, with no benefit to me. Now he's not satisfied with the result of the millions whose altruism gives his kid an education at a fraction of it's real cost, and wants to opt out and wants a tax break. Fuck him and the horse he rode in on. John

To: Joe NYC who wrote (212305)	11/29/2004 10:05:21 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577892

2. tax credit or voucher - Brian tax + expense stays 1 U - Your tax stays 1 U Issue after issue shows that you are just unable to think clearly. Gee, that's not the typical conservative screw_thy_neighbor approach, is it? You want John to pay his full share of the bill, even though he has no kids in the system (sounds like income re-distributioin to me) and give brian the freedom to opt out and get a voucher (brian being a fictitious person with a kid in the system, and john with none)!! Wouldn't it be the republican way to return the savings to people like john who have no kids in the system? I guess some things need to be socialized after all (not the least of which is a child, by the way). Al