Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Thread Morons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Poet who wrote (11211)	11/26/2004 1:23:33 PM
From: Graystone	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12810

Quick approval or Mobthought driven morons The easiest nomination coming out this whole story is squealing right now, I am truly considering using my Ignore function for the very first time ever in our community, I won't of course because I might miss some fun. This thread is about morons and what constitutes moronosity. I have often wondered why this moron's camp is full of stupid attack dogs and fawning sycophants. It has become clearer to me. I feel sorry seeing Mr. Spock used like that. Here is my Nomination for Moron Message 20803258 Feel free to choose sides, I expect a whole pack of yapping hounds to be here pretty soon. They will probably start arriving while I am typing this post. <g>

To: Poet who wrote (11211)	11/27/2004 1:07:25 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12810

I had no idea I was being discussed until I was alerted by someone else. This post isn't so much aimed at you but rather at the topic itself. As of now there is zero evidence other than the word of a man in jail that there were shots fired at him. There has been no mention of any drinking or anything else that would impair the decision making process of the people who were shot. I'd almost bet my life that there were some racial slurs tossed around. Was that needed? No. Was it worthy of death? No. What has been said is that Vang shot the person he alleges shot at him first. While the person called for help Vang changed into camouflage. This is where things get almost Vietnam like. Vang circled around and shot several of the people in the back. They were unarmed! As one person cried out for help he walked up and shot that person in the head. This case will be solved and we will know exactly what transpired IMO. But even if 1 idiot shot at him (and nothing has been suggested that effect other than by Vang) its going to be pretty hard to mount a self defense case that saw a man kill six people when there was 1 gun between them. What gives this case even more of a twist is that another hunter was killed on private land in November of 2001 that has never been solved. The 1 piece of evidence the police had to go on was that people reported seeing 3 Asian men in the area along with a brown Toyota truck parked outside the woods. Oddly enough Vang owned a Brown Toyota truck in 2001. I'm not trying to be Perry Mason but there are certainly some dots to be connected that suggest (circumstantial or otherwise) that Vang may be a mass murderer. At this point there is every reason to believe he probably is IM personal O.