Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : WAR on Terror. Will it engulf the Entire Middle East? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorne who wrote (8139)	11/26/2004 11:37:30 PM
From: hdl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 32591

he has been a member for years. r u saying during most of that period he posted under a different name?

To: lorne who wrote (8139)	11/30/2004 10:11:51 PM
From: Eashoa' M'sheekha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32591

" You are defending the grandpappy of islam terror? " Well gee no lorne.I am trying to defend honesty and truth,something your article wasn't concerned with,since it has absolutely NO proof. Proof does still matter,doesn't it? " Ah, I suppose not really surprising. ".. ".. I can only guess that you believe that anyone who seeks the truth is automatically defending someone or something that may or may not be truthful. That's sad. " Ya know what's really silly? You. I posted an article without saying if I agreed with it or without saying that what was in the article were " FACTS " ".. If you post it and don't refute it, then the reader will always consider you to be in agreement with it.Unless you believe in posting articles you disagree with and hope everyone knows you disagree with it.Sounds goofy to me. " So why do you appear to be defending arafat the islam terrorist? "... Again...I am defending nothing or anybody but the truth. Without facts, it should be considered no more than politically motivated speculation and propaganda, and should be received as such. " Have you not seen any " FACTS " indicating that arafat is an islam terrorists? ".. The facts are that there are many forms of terror from many sources.The old saying that " one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter " is being addressed from many circles these days though. Here is a good argument against : ict.org.il And one For the ideological argument : antiwar.com But here today...fresh off the press : UN Panel Unveils Sweeping Reform Proposal : politinfo.com Experts say the definition of terrorism might be the panel's most significant contribution. A definition has till now eluded scholars and diplomats. The report defines terrorism as "any action intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians or non-combatants, when the purpose of such an act is to compel a government or international organization to do or abstain from doing any act." Interesting..yes? E'M'