Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Thread Morons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Graystone who wrote (11279)	11/27/2004 12:57:14 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Respond to of 12810

you seem to have a problem with people speculating and even reaching a conclusion about the "tribesman" (why do you call him that?). Yet you don't seem to have a problem with grainne's use of the legal term "murderers" for those that were slain. And yet, they only had one gun between them. Is it that you believed the news reports that they were all hunters and therefore deserved their execution (by another hunter no less)? And isn't the "tribesman" a murderer too by grainne's definition since he too is a hunter (I'm only talking about the deer this time, wouldn't want to assume anything about him hunting humans and upset your delicate sensibilities). I believe the news reports that there was only one gun between the 8 people who were shot. We can only draw the conclusion that one of them was a hunter with that information. Also, that only one of them was a threat to the "tribesmen". Perhaps you should talk to grainne about her premature condemnation of the slain. but then again, you can't do that, can you?....LOL!!!