To: stockman_scott who wrote (22488 ) 11/27/2004 10:24:11 PM From: bull_derrick Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23153 First of all, a 40% change in currency does not signify a collapse, which was the term that author used. The yen has traded between 85 yen to a dollar and 140 in my lifetime. Do extreme swings affect economies, yes, but these types of valuation changes can occur and do not signify a collapse. The reality is that the weak dollar is both stimulatory (if you're a Toyota exec, you may increase production in America and cut it in Japan or Europe), and it's also inflationary. Inflation is good if it's profits. It's bad when it affects the supply chain which can lower profits. We have enough evidence of both that the Fed will probably keep increasing rates well into next year, a 1/4 point each turn. As rates increase, foreign investors have a reason to keep investing here. Real rates have 200 bp to make really neutral stance and perhaps the Fed goes up 400-500 bp from here before the rates start to strengthen the dollar and slow economic growth. The labor utilization rate is the one thing Greenspan has consistently worried about in terms of fighting inflation, much more so than commodity prices. I don't believe the chicken-little perspective of the article will be born out. However, given a higher inflationary and higher interest period ahead as a given, certain investments like REITS and long dated bonds are probably headed for correction next year. Many bonds and preferred stocks are trading above par and that won't last when rates go up. On the other hand, if one looked at the value of the S&P as expressed in Euros instead of dollars, which is how one would view the market if one were a European investor, and the US market gets cheaper in Euro terms as the dollar weakens. In Euro terms, the market could go up in dollar terms and stay the same valuation in European terms. I noticed the US markets rallied when the dollar went from the dollar mark to the 1.20 mark previously and wondered if it were due to this effect. I believe the US markets will continue to have a positive bias between now and December because the fund managers have bonus payments on the line. Lingering optimism will probably carry the market higher until early April (with down days thrown in here and there obviously) but I plan to make some major adjustments in March. Having said all of the above, the administration should be more proactive IMHO with the Yuan. A Republican congress could pass an official USD-Yuan exchange rate at more competitive rates and require all US businesses such as Wal-Mart to transact their foreign currency rates through the banking system (and ultimately the Fed) at the US official rate instead of the Chinese official rate. I don't believe the administration would ever do such a thing, however I believe that the balance of power between the US and China is likely to change over the next 10 years if the US isn't willing to become more decisive in making the Yuan exchange rate less stimulatory to the Chinese economy and more stimulatory to the US economy.