SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (662869)11/27/2004 4:48:29 PM
From: CYBERKEN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
NO SURPRISE that a total MORON like you is completely missing the New Reality...

Three things the Democrats could do IMMEDIATELY to BEGIN the long process of survival:

1) Dump the Global Warming Fraud-and never mention it again. This is the first step toward kicking the ruinous addiction to general enviro-whacko insanity, and would clean many of the most OBNOXIOUS lefties out of the party right away.

2) Do a 180 on the Iraq War and start calling it what it is: A CRITICAL early step in a generation-long war against radical Islam. This would put the party ahead of George Bush, who is STILL getting away with the distortion that this is just a "war on terror". PATRIOTISM worked for Truman, Kennedy, Roosevelt, and many others. Just exactly WHY do you believe that an American political party HAS to be anti-American?

3) Stop the class hatred-at least enough to accept supply-side economics. Jack Kemp was RIGHT: There is a huge increase in federal revenue generated by reductions in marginal tax rates and taxes on capital formation. You Dems will always want to sell yourselves on robbing the working public and transferring the money to your worthless constituents. Then AT LEAST be a LITTLE innovative and original and accept the sure-fire way to CREATE that money. We can all fight over what to do with it later.

The Democrat party is the longest continuously-surviving political party in human history. It would be a REAL SHAME if you Dems blew it all simply because you couldn't out-think Michael Moore...



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (662869)11/27/2004 8:38:20 PM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 769670
 
well Kenneth. I suppose New York , a Blue State would have to desegregate their racially and alt-gender schools. lol You are such a goof.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (662869)11/27/2004 10:05:25 PM
From: sandintoes  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
How ridiculous.

They should behave like they did in South Boston, or in Chicago...they welcomed everyone...NOT They stoned the children..

The South has mixed schools period!

The North hasn't.
Take a look at your schools and look at ours...no comparison..

urbanedjournal.org

Due to all of these failures, Boston's integration battles continued long after Judge Garrity began busing students in 1974. As one busing opponent said years after the busing had begun, "We won. We prevented it for eight years…[Garrity's] program was never a success" (Formisano, 1991, p. 203). In some ways, she was correct. Boston schools today are far more segregated than they were in 1974. The white flight that anti-busers had forecast early on in the debates did indeed come true. Though its causes are many, white enrollment in Boston's public schools declined over 16% in the year Phase I of Garrity's plan began. Prior to this, the decline in white enrollment in the Boston Public Schools had never been more than 5.8% in a single year. In 1976, as Phase II was put into place, white enrollment declined another 16.5% (Buell & Brisbin, 1982). In addition, the student population was soon composed of a much higher percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Though students were being actively spread around the city, the pool of students had dramatically changed, making integration increasingly difficult.

In the years that followed the start of mandatory busing in Boston, Charles Glenn, Mayor White and even Louise Day Hicks all expressed regrets over aspects of their behavior at the time. They spoke of missed opportunities, poor judgment, and a lack of foresight. Had there been even one strong leader with perspective, nerve, authority, responsibility, vision, and commitment, the results might have been so much different. The battles over busing in Boston continued to shape Boston's educational system and political landscape for well over a decade. In 1984, Raymond Flynn, an anti-integrationist active in 1974, was elected as mayor of Boston. It was not until September 1985 that Judge Garrity issued his 415th and final court order and returned control of the schools to the Boston School Committee. He did, however, retain "standby jurisdiction" to intervene again, should he deem it necessary (Malloy, 1986).

For Boston's public schools, the Brown decision in 1954 laid the groundwork for a contentious battle that would ostensibly end more than 30 years after the decision was handed down. Overt battles in courtrooms and classrooms ended with a result that complied with the letter of the law but largely failed in its intent. Students ended up attending school in a district that was more segregated than it was at the time of the Brown decision. The small size of districts in many northern states (in comparison to the county-wide districts in many southern states) and the legal prohibition against forcing suburban districts to participate in desegregation plans presented a set of structural and legal challenges to successful desegregation. The tools that integration advocates attempted to use to surmount these challenges, legislation and litigation, were blunt instruments that largely neglected those who would be most directly affected by the resulting changes.