Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Election Fraud Reports -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_urchin who wrote (215)	11/28/2004 11:31:26 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Respond to of 1729

Hi Searle, Re: Now that you removed your original post it looks like I replied to myself! Unfortunately, I posted that item without the requisite due diligence. When I went to the Ohio Secretary of State's Unofficial Vote Totals pages, I discovered that the anomaly that Rosenfeld had found had disappeared. This may have been similar to the goofy way that Cuyahoga County accounted for absentee ballots, or it may well have another explanation. Without clarification, it seemed like it was best to remove an unsubstantiated claim of fraud. *** The Oklahoma information seems quite crazy. I'm going to have to see what can explain the anomalies there.