SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Seeker of Truth who wrote (56615)11/29/2004 3:49:37 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 74559
 
To know the future we still have to look at the company itself, its competitors, the local situation, world situation etc.

why TA is useless? My view is that for you to able to <<have to look at the company itself, its competitors, the local situation, world situation etc.>> you need to:

1) be minimum 35 years old.

2) Have been involved in the industry you're analysing

3) Have the right contacts within the industry you're analysing

4) have worked and lived in at least 3 countries in different continents

5) Know a couple languages besides English.

Universities don't supply this animal. By the supply technical analysts and they carve up a market for their skills.



To: Seeker of Truth who wrote (56615)11/29/2004 5:02:47 AM
From: energyplay  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
I was extremely skeptical about TA for a long time....

*****

A better test -

Given 100 randomly selected charts, a TA analyst can select 15 of them, and get statistically significant results.

For the other 85 charts, TA can be would not add much value.

This can be tried a large number of times, and produce positve results.

Some fairly rigrous examples of this were done at MIT about 2 years ago - soem profs were looking to do an easy paper showing thast TA did not work.

******

This track record is not as good as a 30 day weather prediction, or even a 60 day weather prediction.

But it does add enough of an edge that hedge funds and major I banks pay the salaries of TA people, and not just to advise clients.

******

Behavourial finance is providing scientific basis for certain TA patterns.



To: Seeker of Truth who wrote (56615)11/29/2004 8:05:04 PM
From: Hugh A  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hi Malcolm: Sour grapes? Sounds like you lost some money to TA - tell us a story.

That's not T&A where one always loses money!

HA