Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (152883)	11/29/2004 5:09:05 PM
From: Michael Watkins	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 281500

If you are prepared to take logic that far then, you must fall into one of two categories: 1) Iraq should not have been invaded since no evidence links it to 9/11 nor specifically disproves such a link, therefore it is not prudent to attack a possible innocent. 2) Iraq should have been invaded anyway, since logic is only rolled out when it supports long-held desires to conquer other nations. By the same measure we can use that logic or lack thereof to invade Iran, Canada, Venezuela, Nigeria, Norway, and Cuba (for good measure and to finish a job started years ago). Which one best fits your application of "logic"?