Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richnorth who wrote (698)	11/30/2004 2:19:06 PM
From: sandintoes	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224648

Whine #1 Bush allowed the outsourcing of jobs. (Pleasing of his cronies was involved in this regard.) So, Bush is responsible for loss of jobs which would otherwise have been available in America. What was he suppose to do, stand at the border as the companies who had started their stampede to leave the country under Clinton, continued on their way? Whine #2 Yes, though money goes into the pockets of Americans, they are now unable to buy and do more with it as much as they were able before. We have more money, but we can't spend it??? Whine #3 Wow! It looks like you have a lame duck president with whom big corporations are at liberty to play merry hell as in the Enron case! Incredible! You think I've a limited vocabulary? Perhaps, but I did pass my HS Civics class and I do understand the meaning of a Lame Duck Politician, and Bush was duly elected so he is now a returning elected President. A lame-duck politician = a politician who has not been reelected (un político no reelegido) and is serving the remainder of his term in office during the interim between the day of elections (in which he lost) and the day the newly elected politician takes over the office. One phrase that is unscrupulously repeated Ad Nauseum from one MSM to another and finally you little people pick up on it, and waste our valuable time repeating it to us? Must you insist on using the same old tactic people with no message employ? Do all of you train from the same repeated exercises? When you have nothing to say, must you insist on attacking the individual personally? Go look into the mirror and you will see a very haggard and demented witch! Are you afraid to look into the mirror? You are hereby banished. Begone before you get burnt at the stake! You have no control over this thread...so put away your pitchfork and go buy the book..How To Win Friends and Influence People! With your last comment, your bad traits shine through, and I no longer have any use for you. ..You are ignored!