Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Earlie who wrote (298678)	11/30/2004 8:49:39 PM
From: Terry Maloney	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 436258

Earlie, in any sane world that's how it would be, but I don't trust this bunch not to go postal on us rather than see that happen. Hopefully I'm just paranoid. <g/ng>

To: Earlie who wrote (298678)	11/30/2004 9:47:46 PM
From: Michael Watkins	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

> A large military that exceeds a country's ability to maintain becomes a "mill stone" fairly quickly. < And here's the interesting thing - a huge percentage of the annual cost of this military goes to ensuring that sufficient oil can be exploited around the world to feed it into our SUV's at 2$ a gallon. I did the math recently: If US military spending and grants allocated to the Middle East were factored into the oil that came from there, every barrel would cost 166$. And the gasoline from that oil would cost 6$ a gallon. I probably missed 10 - 70 billion in my calculations, after all I can only add up the stuff which is disclosed. Who knows what the CIA, DIA, NRO, NSA, etc spend over there.... Anyway, I don't see how this is sustainable.