To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (21709 ) 12/1/2004 12:22:22 AM From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 32917 Bill, perhaps a better analogy would be a health club. Back in the day, as they say, they used to provide lifetime memberships (now outlawed in most states because of problems not to dissimilar to those discussed here). If the premises were remodeled, equipment upgraded, a pool or sauna added, etc. then you benefited at *no* cost. But, if the club added, say, personal training or a massage room, you'd still have to pay for these premium services like anyone else. Obviously if the place went slowly into disrepair and eventually closed, you were screwed. Lifetime memberships are good for the lifetime of the club, not yours. So, there are two real issues here. The first is whether SI can legally be construed to have closed down. Since money changed hands, as opposed to just different management taking over, I would think the answer would be yes. If so, all prior contracts are void. Case closed. The fact that Bob has decided to honor any contracts at all is simply out of the goodness of his heart. The second issue is what is the least arbitrary way to differentiate a standard from a premium service? My answer to that is to determine what features require processing and/or bandwidth requirements above and beyond the norm. For example, searching through 20 million+ messages is going to put a hit on the system, so that's clearly a premium option. Batching 20 instead of 10 messages, considering cache sizes and bandwidth these days, is probably a negligible hit and thus something I wouldn't consider to be premium. But keep in mind that these are distinctions for after someone has purchased a (currently, as opposed to previously, valid) membership. You can make any arbitrary distinction you want for prospective new members. - Jeff