Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: unclewest who wrote (88891)	12/1/2004 12:04:36 PM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 793712

It was a proud man feeling bad. I agree. I felt for him, too. That the segment didn't get to the bottom of what happened wasn't his fault. It was very poorly designed. They wasted a lot of time at first with Hannity asking him to tell his story given the problems of them not being in the same room and then him being cut off before he got to the salient part of the story because it was Colmes's turn. And before we got to the meat, Colmes turned the discussion to a rehash of the Swiftvet thing. Thus my comment that there was a lot of posturing, little new information, and no analysis. I'm sure Gardner is stress having been caught up in a national conflagration that way way over his head. And now his job is lost. He can be forgiven for jumping to conclusions and blaming the flame-throwers. But those who are jumping to conclusions with him are reckless. I already know all that I need to know to become part of the solution. If your idea of the solution is to help the guy out, I agree with you. If your idea of the solution is to take vengeance on the company without substantiation, that's another matter.