Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (90238)	12/1/2004 12:52:14 PM
From: E	Respond to of 108807

As I said, I don't know why Jewel was banned. What is the issue of disagreement you feel caused a "disagreement" ban? What opinion was the opinion expressed that would have been banned if expressed civilly?

To: longnshort who wrote (90238)	12/1/2004 8:20:00 PM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

"Sounds like Laz was ban for disagreeing with grannie, same as Jewel." Longandshort, I am really tired of the character assassination around here, directed at me in this case. I am going to put a stop to it, because it is totally unfair and the drip, drip, drip of attacks on my integrity on a daily basis is really tarnishing the nice things about the Feelies thread. SO, I am giving you 24 hours to either prove by citing the posts involved (they are all public posts further back on the thread) that I banned Jewel or Laz for disagreeing with me, OR acknowledging in a post to me that you were incorrect in both cases. If you do not do one of these things, I will ban you for character assassination. Now is that perfectly clear?